Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:28:32.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Curvature Model for an Ion-Machined Free-Standing Thin Film MEMS Device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

H.T. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215
P. Bierden
Affiliation:
Boston Micromachines Corp., Boston, MA 02215
T. G. Bifano
Affiliation:
Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215
Get access

Abstract

The connection between processing effects and curvature of a free-standing poly-Si thin film MEMS structure is analyzed theoretically and compared to experimental data. Estimates are made for the strain resulting from processing and post-processing effects including Phosphorus implantation and chemically neutral ion-beam machining. The inferred strain distribution is used to predict the curvature of the free-standing structure upon release from its host substrate. Curvature predictions agree closely with experimental measurements for particular choices of the processing strain magnitudes. The analysis procedure is proposed as a means to determine the through-thickness stress distribution in a free-standing structure. The ion-beam machining procedure is found to be a useful method for planarizing free-standing thin film structures with undesirable curvature due to process-induced stress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gupta, R. K., Osterberg, P. M., Senturia, S. D., Proc. of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 2880, 39 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Singh, J., Chandra, S., Chand, A., Sens. and Actuat. A77, 133 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Elbrecht, L., Storm, U., Catanescu, R., Binder, J., J. Micromech. and Microeng. 7, 151 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Stoney, G. G., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A82, 172 (1909).Google Scholar
5. Fang, W. and Wickert, J. A., J. Micromech. and Microeng. 6, 301 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Johnson, G. C. and Krulevitch, P., Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division 46, 89 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Freund, L. B., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 44, 723 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Bifano, T., Johnson, H. T., Bierden, P., Mali, R., submitted to J. MEMS (2001).Google Scholar
9. Flemish, J. R., Tressler, R. E., Ruzyllo, J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 205 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Krulevitch, P., Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley (1994).Google Scholar
11. Kauffman, H. R. and Robinson, R. S., Operation of Broad-Beam Sources, (Commonwealth Scientific Corporation, Alexandria, VA, 1987).Google Scholar
12. Lee, H., Rosakis, A. J., Freund, L. B., J. Appl. Phys., in press (2001).Google Scholar