Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:58:44.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current-Voltage Characteristics-What Do Experiments Really Tell Us?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Finley R. Shapiro
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pa. 19104
Marvin Silver
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C. 27599-3255.
Get access

Abstract

Experimentally measured current-voltage measurements in amorphous silicon hydride pin diodes have been fit to computer simulations by Hack and den Boer [1] using relatively small values for the neutral and charged trap capture rates. Silver and Cannella [2] have proposed larger values for the capture rates, accompanied by larger electron and hole band mobilities. We discuss here the possible reasons for expecting the larger values for the capture rates, and their influence on current voltage measurements both with and without the higher mobilities. It is found that the simulated I-V results using only the larger capture rates are much smaller than those for Hack and den Boer's parameters. However, when the large values are used for both the capture rates and the mobilities, the I-V relationship is quite similar to that for the smaller capture rates and mobilities. We also show the differences in the simulated transient currents for the different sets of parameters, and we discuss the causes of these differences.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Hack, M. and den Boer, W., J. Appl. Phys. 5, 1554 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Silver, M. and Cannella, V., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 97&98, 305 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Slver, M., Snow, E., Cannella, V., McGill, J., Yaniv, Z., and Adler, D., in Physics of Amorphous Semiconductor Devices (SPIE 763, 1987) pp. 141146.Google Scholar
[4] Shapiro, F.R., PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1988.Google Scholar
[5] Shapiro, F.R. and Bar-Yam, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 2185 (1988).Google Scholar
[6] Silver, M., Snow, E., Wright, B., Aiga, M., and Moore, L., Phil. Mag. B 47, L39 (1983); M. Silver, E. Snow, N. C. Giles, M. P. Shaw, V. Cannella, S. Payson, R. Ross, and S. Hudgens, Physica 117B & 118B, 905 (1983); M. Silver, E. Snow, and D. Adler, Sol. St. Commun. 51, 581 (1984).Google Scholar
[7] Silver, M., Adler, D., Shaw, M. P., and Cannella, V., Phil. Mag. B 53, L89 (1986).Google Scholar
[8] Shapiro, F. R. and Silver, M., IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., in press.Google Scholar
[9] Many, A. and Rakavy, G., Phys. Rev. 126, 1980 (1962).Google Scholar