Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:27:36.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Creep Behavior of a Superplastic Y-TZP/Al2O3 Composite: An Examination of the Possibility for Diffusion Creep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Siari S. Sosa
Affiliation:
Departments of Materials Science and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1453 ssosa@usc.edu
Terence G. Langdon
Affiliation:
Departments of Materials Science and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1453 ssosa@usc.edu
Get access

Abstract

The creep characteristics of a high purity superplastic Y-TZP/Al2O3 composite were studied. The test samples had a uniform initial grain size of essentially equiaxed grains and the phase distribution was also uniform. Creep tests were conducted at elevated temperatures in tension and measurements were taken after testing to determine the average size and shape of the grains. The creep curves showed the existence of a primary stage of creep and then a transition into a steady-state region where the strain rate remained reasonably constant. Observations by scanning electron microscopy revealed an elongation of the alumina grains with the grain strain essentially matching the overall strain within the sample. There was some grain growth after testing at the lower stresses. Preliminary observations using an atomic force microscope revealed direct evidence for the occurrence of some grain boundary sliding within the samples. The results are compared with earlier data reported for Y-TZP/Al2O3 composites and they are analyzed using the interface reaction-controlled diffusion creep model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nabarro, F.R.N in Report of a Conference on Strength of Solids (The Physical Society, London, 1948), p. 75.Google Scholar
2. Herring, C., J. Appl. Phys. 21, 437 (1950).10.1063/1.1699681Google Scholar
3. Coble, R.L., J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1679 (1963).10.1063/1.1702656Google Scholar
4. Green, H.W., J. Appl. Phys. 41, 3899 (1970).10.1063/1.1659525Google Scholar
5. Yavari, P. and Langdon, T.G., J. Testing Eval. 10, 174 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Langdon, T.G., Mater. Sci. Eng. A174, 225 (1994).10.1016/0921-5093(94)91092-8Google Scholar
7. Berbon, M.Z. and Langdon, T.G., Acta Mater. 47, 2485 (1999).10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00099-3Google Scholar
8. Rachinger, W.A., J. Inst. Metals 81, 33 (1952-1953).Google Scholar
9. Lifshitz, I.M., Soviet Phys. JETP 17, 909 (1963).Google Scholar
10. Cannon, W.R., Phil. Mag. 25, 1489 (1972).10.1080/14786437208223868Google Scholar
11. Clarisse, L., Bataille, A., Pennec, Y., Crampon, J. and Duclos, R., Ceram. Intl. 25, 389 (1999).10.1016/S0272-8842(98)00044-3Google Scholar
12. Wakai, F., Kato, H., Sakaguchi, S. and Murayama, N., J. Ceram. Soc. Japan 94, 1017 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Wakai, F. and Kato, H., Adv. Ceram. Mater. 3, 71 (1988).10.1111/j.1551-2916.1988.tb00173.xGoogle Scholar
14. Owen, D.M. and Chokshi, A.H., J. Mater. Sci. 29, 5497 (1994).10.1007/BF01171563Google Scholar
15. Owen, D.M. and Chokshi, A.H., Acta Mater. 46, 667 (1998).10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00251-6Google Scholar
16. Kronberg, M.L., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 45, 274 (1962).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1962.tb11143.xGoogle Scholar
17. Conrad, H., Stone, G. and Janowski, J., Trans. AIME 233, 889 (1965).Google Scholar
18. Firestone, R.F. and Heuer, A.H., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 56, 136 (1973).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1973.tb15429.xGoogle Scholar
19. Pletka, B.J., Heuer, A.H. and Mitchell, T.E., Acta Mater. 25, 25 (1977).10.1016/0001-6160(77)90242-5Google Scholar