Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T07:39:07.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corrosion Behaviour of Truw Base and Reference Glasses+

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

P. Van Iseghem
Affiliation:
Materials Science Department, S.C.K./C.E.N., B-2400 MOL (Belgium)
W. Timmermans
Affiliation:
Materials Science Department, S.C.K./C.E.N., B-2400 MOL (Belgium)
R. De Batist
Affiliation:
Also Rijksuniversitair Centrum Antwerpen, B-2020 ANTWERPEN (Belgium)
Get access

Abstract

The corrosion behaviour of five TRUW base and reference glasses in distilled water has been investigated for times up to 8 months. The glasses were chosen to evaluate some of the main features of the basaltic slag as produced by the prototype FLK incinerator, i.e. the iron valence state and the relative influence of Al2O3 vs FeOx. Diffusion processes control the corrosion for times below 80 d at 90°C at the SA.V-1 value currently considered (1 cm-1), resulting in the formation of complex films enriched in Al, Fe and Mg over 200 nm thick. The partial replacement of 10 mole 7 Fe2Ox by Al2O3 improves the chemical resistance and strongly accelerates saturation of the leachate for Si, and apparently also for Na and K. The iron valence

state in the glass does not seem to influence the corrosion behaviour. When leaching at temperature up to 200°C, the surfaces of all glasses crystallize, while the corrosion rates do not decrease with time. At SA.V−1 ≠ 0.1 cm−1 , 90°C, the weight losses increase by a factor up to 10 relative to SA.V−1 ≠ 1 cm−1 , 90°C, and the initial diffusion controlled stage might be followed by matrix dissolution reactions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

+

Supported in part by the Commission of the European Communities.

References

REFERENCES

1. Flinn, J.E., Henslee, S.P., Kelsey, P.V., Tallman, R.L. and Welch, J.M. in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management; vol. 3,Moore, J.G. ed., (Plenum Press 1981) pp. 201208.10.1007/978-1-4684-4040-9_26Google Scholar
2. Paul, A. and Zaman, M.S., J. Mat. Sci. 13, 1499 (1978).10.1007/BF00553205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Levy, R.A., Lupis, C.H.P. and Flinn, P.A., Phys. & Chem. of Glasses 17, 94 (1976).Google Scholar
4. Labar, C. and Gielen, P., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 13, 107 (1973-1974).10.1016/0022-3093(73)90040-9Google Scholar
5. De Batist, R., De Grave, E., Timmermans, W., Vangeel, J. and Van Iseghem, P. in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, vol. 2, Northrup, C.J.M. Jr. ed., (Plenum Press 1980) pp. 351359.10.1007/978-1-4684-3839-0_42Google Scholar
6. Van Iseghem, P., De Grave, E., Peters, L. and De Batist, R., BLG-560 (1983); (Poster presentation at the XIII International Congress on Glass (Hamburg, July 1983)).Google Scholar
7. DOC/TIC 11400 –Nuclear Waste Materials HandbookTest Methods. PNLRichland (Washington) USA (1981).Google Scholar
8. Van Iseghem, P., Timmermans, W. and De Batist, R., presented at the CEC Seminar Testing, Evaluation and Shallow Land Burial of Low and Medium Radioactive Waste Forms (Geel, September 1983), in press.Google Scholar
9. Clark, D.E., Ethridge, E.C., Dilmore, M.F. and Hench, L.L., Glass Technol. 18 (4), 121 (1977).Google Scholar
10. Fullam, H.T., PNL 3614 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Clark, D.E., Pantano, C.G. Jr. and Hench, L.L. in: Corrosion of Glass, Books for Industry (1979).Google Scholar