Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:37:48.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conversion of 124 into 123 + CuO: microstructure and phase diagram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Donald E. Morris ,
Janice H. Nickel ,
Andrea G. Markelz ,
Ronald Gronsky ,
Mark Fendorf  and
Christopher P. Burmester
Donald E. Morris
Affiliation:
2‐300 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Janice H. Nickel
Affiliation:
2‐300 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Andrea G. Markelz
Affiliation:
2‐300 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Ronald Gronsky
Affiliation:
2‐300 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Mark Fendorf
Affiliation:
2‐300 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Christopher P. Burmester
Affiliation:
2‐300 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

Conversion of 124 into 123 + CuO is interesting because it can produce non‐superconducting CuO islands and highly strained local regions, both of which may act as flux pinning centers. Microstructural studies (TEM) show localized regions with high strain fields resulting from the lattice mismatch between 124 and 123 along the c axis. Enhanced Tc (95 K) was found in partly converted samples. The partial pressure of oxygen necessary for conversion from YBa2Cu4O8 (124) to YBa2Cu307 (123) decreases with decreasing temperatures, and below 850°C the boundary between 123 and 124 phase regions is found to fall approximately as log ρ(θ2) = 19.3 ‐22000/T. The phase diagram of the Y‐Ba‐Cu‐O system is given as a function of temperature and partial pressure of oxygen over the range between 500°C and 1000°C and 10‐6< P[O2] < 102 bar.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 169: Symposium M – High Temperature Superconductors: Fundamental Properties and Novel Materials Processing , 1989 , 245
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Morris, D. E., et al. , Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report No. LBL‐26250 (Nov. 1988); D. E. Morris, proposal to U.S.Dept of Energy; U.S. and foreign patents pending.Google Scholar
2 Morris, D. E. et al. , Physica C 159, 287 (1989).Google Scholar
3 Morris, D. E. et al. , Phys. Rev. B 40, 11406 (1989).Google Scholar
4 Karpinski, J. et al. , Nature 336, 660 (1988).Google Scholar
5 Jin, S. , O'Bryan, H. M., Gallagher, P. K., Tiefel, T. H., Cava, R. J., Fastnacht, R. A., and Kammlott, G. W., submitted to Phyisca C.Google Scholar
6 Morris, D. E. et.al., Phys. Rev. B 39, 7347 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Morris, D. E., et al. , submitted to Physica C.Google Scholar
8 Bucher, B. et.al.,Physica C 157,478 (1989).Google Scholar
9 Pooke, D.M., Buckley, R.G., Presland, M.R., and Tallon, J.L., preprintGoogle Scholar
10 Bormann, R. and Noelting, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2148 (1989)Google Scholar
11 Smyth, H. and Roberts, H. S., American Chemical Society Journal 42, 2582 (1920).Google Scholar
12 Lindemer, T. B. and Sutton, A. L., , Jr., Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/ TM‐10827 (1988)Google Scholar
13 Specht, E. D. et al., Phys. Rev. B 37, 7426 (1988)Google Scholar