Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T10:06:37.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Variants in Heteroepitaxy by Substrate Miscut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C P Flynn
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, ILL 61801, USA
S M Bonham
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, ILL 61801, USA
J A Eades
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, ILL 61801, USA
M Ondrejcek
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, ILL 61801, USA
W Swiech
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, ILL 61801, USA
G L Zhou
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, ILL 61801, USA
Get access

Abstract

This paper discusses variants that occur in heteroepitaxy when the substrate possesses symmetries that are absent from the epilayer. Variants are enumerated in terms of 2-D symmetries of the substrate and epilayer, as they exist terminated at their interface. In this formulation, all possible cases can be presented in a single table. The role of miscut in controlling otherwise equal variants proportions is discussed with a view to eliminating unwanted variants and thereby improving the translational invariance of the materials. We summarize an experimental study of a (3m) symmetry epilayer growing on a (2mm) substrate, specifically Cu3Au (111) grown by molecular beam epitaxy on Nb (110), for which the two variants predicted from symmetry are stacking twins. Miscuts of about 1° along the indicated azimuth are sufficient to eliminate all except ∼ 0.1% of the less favored variant. This has interesting consequences in the context of the theory. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms for this example requires information about nanostructures that develop on the miscut Nb (011) surface. State-of-the-art information about novel substrate nanostructures, derived from scanning probe and low energy electron microscopies, is presented, and the prospects for a predictive science of variant control in heteroepitaxial growth are assessed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Fischer, R, Chand, N, Kopp, W, Morkoc, H, Erickson, L P and Youngman, R, Appl Phys Lett, 47, 397 (1985).Google Scholar
2 Uppal, P N and Kroemer, H, J Appl Phys, 58, 2195 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Strite, S, Unlu, M S, Gao, G-B, Agerwal, A, Rockett, A, Morkoc, H, Li, D, Nakamura, Y, J Vac Sci Technol B8, 1131 (1990).Google Scholar
4 Sutton, A P and Balluffi, R W, Interfaces in crystalline solids, Oxford (1995).Google Scholar
5 Tendeloo, G Van and Amelinckx, S, Acta Cryst A30, 431 (1974).Google Scholar
6 Pond, R C and Vlachavas, D S, Proc Roy Soc Lond, A386, 95 (1983)Google Scholar
7 Flynn, C P and Eades, J A, to be published.Google Scholar
8 Bonham, S W and Flynn, C P, Phys Rev, B58, 10875 (1998).Google Scholar
9 Eckstein, J N, Bozovik, I, Schlom, D G and Harris, J S, Appl Phys Lett 57, 1049 (1990).Google Scholar
10 Theis, C D and Schlom, D G, J Mater Res 12, 1297 (1997).Google Scholar
11 Hammond, C, The basics of crystallography and diffraction, Oxford (1997).Google Scholar
12 Love, A E H, The mathematical theory of elasticity, Dover, NY (1944).Google Scholar
13 Zhou, G L and Flynn, C P, Phys Rev B59, 7860 (1999).Google Scholar
14 Flynn, C P and Swiech, W, Phys Rev Letters 83, 3482 (1999); Phys Rev B(in press).Google Scholar