Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:12:56.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constitutive Response of Passivated Copper Films: Experiments and Analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Y.-L. Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.
U. Ramamurty
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore -560 012, INDIA
Get access

Abstract

The constitutive behavior of passivated copper films is studied. Stresses in copper films of thickness ranging from 1000 nm to 40 nm, passivated with silicon oxide on a quartz or silicon substrate, were measured using the curvature method. The thermal cycling spans a temperature range from - 196 to 600°C. It is seen that the strong relaxation at high temperatures normally found in unpassivated films is nonexistent for passivated films. The copper film did not show any rate-dependent effect over a range of heating/cooling rate from 5 to 25°C/min. Further analyses showed that significant strain hardening exists during the course of thermal loading. In particular, the measured stress- temperature response can only be fitted with a kinematic hardening model, if a simple constitutive law within the continuum plasticity framework is to be used. The analytic procedures for extracting the film properties are presented. Implications to stress modeling of copper interconnects in actual devices are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vinci, R. P., Zeilinski, E. M. and Bravman, J. C., Thin Solid Films 262, 142 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Thouless, M. D., Rodbell, K. P. and Cabral, C. Jr, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 2454 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Baker, S. P., Kretschmann, A. and Arzt, E., Acta Mater. 49, 2145 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Baker, S. P., Keller, R.-M., Kretschmann, A. and Arzt, E., in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VIII, edited by Bravman, J. C., Marieb, T. N., Lloyd, J. R. and Korhonen, M. A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 516, 1998), pp. 287298.Google Scholar
5. Shen, Y.-L., Suresh, S., He, M. Y., Bagchi, A., Kienzle, O., Ruhle, M. and Evans, A. G., J. Mater. Res. 13, 1928 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Shen, Y.-L. and Suresh, S., Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 3915 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Suresh, S., Fatigue of Materials, 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), p. 25.Google Scholar
8. Hirth, J. P. and Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations, 2nd edition (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1982), p. 831.Google Scholar