Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T20:40:35.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computer Simulation Study of Adsorption, Isosteric Heat and Phase Transitions of Methane on Graphite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Shaoyi Jiang
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Keith E. Gubbins
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

We report Canonical (NVTMC), Grand Canonical (GOMC) and Gibbs Ensemble Monte Carlo (GEMC) simulations for adsorption of methane on graphite. Lennard-Jones (LJ) potentials are used for the intermolecular interactions, and both structured and structureless (10–4–3) solid-fluid potentials are considered. Several sets of methane-methane L.I parameters have been used in the literature, and we compare results obtained with these sets throughout our simulations. The adsorption isotherm and isosteric heat curve are obtained at 77.5 K and found in good agreement with experiments. The commensurateincommensurate transition (CIT) of methane on a graphite substrate with periodically varying adsorbate-adsorbent potential at 40.0 K is studied and is in qualitative agreement with experiment. The effect of varying the corrugation of the fluid-wall potential on the commensurate and incommensurate phases is explored. The GEMC simulations have been carried out to study the vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) of a two-dimensional (2D) LJ fluid with system sizes up to 3000 particles. The effect of system sizes on the critical behavior is investigated. The GEMC method has also been successfully applied to study the VLE in 2D adsorbed films for the first time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bienfait, M., Zeppenfeld., P. Gay, J.M. and Palmari, J.P., Surf. Sci. 226, 327 (1990).Google Scholar
[2] Inaba, A., Koga, Y. and Morrison, J.A., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2 82, 1635 (1986).Google Scholar
[3] Kim, H.K., Zhang, Q.M. and Chan, M.H., Phys. Rev. B34, 4699 (1986).Google Scholar
[4] Jiang, S., Gubbins, K.E. and Zollweg, J.A., Mol. Phys. Submitted (1992)Google Scholar
[5] Panagiotopoulos, A.Z., Mol. Phys. 61,813 (1987). A.Z. Panagiotopoulos, N. Quirke, M. Stapleton and D. J. Tildesley, Mol. Phys. 63, 527 (1988).Google Scholar
[6] Smit, B. and Frenkel, D., J. Chem. Phys. 94, 5663 (1991). B. Stair, PhD dissertation, Univ. of Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.Google Scholar
[7] Mon, K.K. and Binder, K., J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6989 (1992).Google Scholar
[8] Schoen, M., Diestler, D.J. and Cushman, J.H., J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5464 (1987).Google Scholar
[9] Steele, W.A., Surf. Sci. 36, 317 (1973). W.A. Steele, The Interaction of Gases with Solid Surfaces (Pergamon, Oxford, 1974).Google Scholar
[10] Hruska, C.D. and Phillips, J.M., Phys. Rev. B37, 3801 (1988).Google Scholar
[11] Jiang, S., Rhykerd, C., Balbuena, P.B, Pozhar, L.A. and Gubbins, K.E., presented at the Annual AIChE Meeting, Los Angles, CA, 1991. Jiang, S., Rhykerd, C., and Gubbins, K.E., Mol. Phys. (in press).Google Scholar
[12] Adams, D.J., Mol. Phys. 28, 1241 (1974). D.J. Adams, Mol. Phys. 29, 307 (1975). D.J. Adams, Mol. Phys. 32, 647 (1979).Google Scholar
[13] Allen, M.P. and Tildesley, D.J., Computer Simulation of Liquids, (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
[14] Whitehouse, J.S., Nicholson, D. and Parsonage, N., Mol. Phys. 49, 829 (1983).Google Scholar
[15] Nicholson, D., Cracknell, R.F. and Parsonage, N., Mol. Simulation, 5, 307 (1990).Google Scholar