Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:15:24.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computer Simulation of Fracture in Aerogels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Brian Good*
Affiliation:
Brian.Good@grc.nasa.gov, NASA Glenn Research Center, Materials and Structures Division, 21000 Brookpark Road, MS 106-5, Cleveland, OH, 44135, United States, 216-433-6296
Get access

Abstract

Aerogels are of interest to the aerospace community primarily for their thermal properties, notably their low thermal conductivities. While the gels are typically fragile, recent advances in the application of conformal polymer layers to these gels has made them potentially useful as lightweight structural materials as well. In this work, we investigate the strength and fracture behavior of silica aerogels using a molecular statics-based computer simulation technique. The gels' structure is simulated via a Diffusion Limited Cluster Aggregation (DLCA) algorithm, which produces fractal structures representing experimentally observed aggregates of so-called secondary particles, themselves composed of amorphous silica primary particles an order of magnitude smaller. We have performed multi-length-scale simulations of fracture in silica aerogels, in which the interaction between two secondary particles is assumed to be described by a Morse pair potential parameterized such that the potential range is much smaller than the secondary particle size. These Morse parameters are obtained by atomistic simulation of models of the experimentally-observed amorphous silica “bridges,” with the fracture behavior of these bridges modeled via molecular statics using a Morse/Coulomb potential for silica. We consider the energetics of the fracture, and compare qualitative features of low-and high-density gel fracture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Husing, N. and Schubert, U., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 22 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Pierre, A. C. and Pajonk, G. M., Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4243 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Rousset, J. L., Boukenter, A., Champagnon, B., Dumas, J., Duval, E., Quinson, J, F and Serughetti, J., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 8445 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Meador, M. A. B., Fabrizio, E. F., Ilhan, F., Dass, A., Zhang, G., Vassilaras, P., Johnston, J. C. and Leventis, N., Chem. Mater. 17, 1085 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Meakin, P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1119 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Mazurin, O. V., Streltsina, M. V. and Shvaiko-Shvaikovskaya, T. P., 1983 Handbook of Glass Data, Part A: Silica Glass and Binary Silicate Glasses, Elsevier, Amsterdam. Google Scholar
7. Woignier, : Woignier, T. and Phalippou, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 93 17 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Schaeffer, D. W., Martin, J. E. and Keefer, K. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2199 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Freltoft, T., Kjems, J. K. and Sinha, S. K., Phys. Rev. B 33, 269 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Vacher, R., Woignier, T, Pelous, J. and Courtens, E., Phys. Rev. B 37, 6500 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Hasmy, A., Anglaret, E., Foret, M., Pelous, J. and Julien, R., Phys. Rev. B 50, 1305 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Eden, M. in Proc. Of the Fourth Berkeley Symp. Of Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. IV, Neyman, F., ed., University of California, Berkeley, 1961.Google Scholar
13. Bensimon, D., Sharaiman, B. and Liang, S., Phys. Lett. 102A, 238 (1984).Google Scholar
14. Witten, T. A. and Sander, L. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1400 (1981).Google Scholar
15. Weitz, D. A. and Oliveria, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1433 (1984).Google Scholar
16 Rose, J. H., Ferrante, J. and Smith, J. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 675 (1981).Google Scholar