Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:37:45.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computational Predictions of the Tensile and Compressive Properties of Rigid-Rod Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Scott G. Wierschke
Scott G. Wierschke*
Affiliation:
Air Force Materials Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-6533
Get access

Abstract

The Austin Model 1 (AM1) semiempirical molecular orbital method has been used to calculate tensile moduli and molecular tensile and compressive deformation for several rigid-rod polymers and a graphite model. The calculated moduli are an improvement over previous Modified Neglect of Differential Overlap (MNDO) calculations. These are the ultimate moduli or the perfectly aligned bulk systems. By analyzing the deformation of polymer molecules in tension and compression, the failure modes and weak points in the molecules can be determined. In compression, all the heterocyclic rigid-rod polymers exhibit a “bending” failure mode. In tension and compression, the phenyl group in the rods undergoes in-plane deformation more easily than the heterocyclic moiety, thus causing a lowering of the modulus. The hypothetical “ladder” polymer, polyacene, shows higher tensile and compressive resistance than any of the rods, suggesting that further study into the ladder polymers is warranted.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 134: Symposium J – Materials Science and Engineering of Rigid-Rod Polymers , 1988 , 313
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. (a) Hehre, W.J., Radom, L., Schleyer, P.v.R., Pople, J.A., Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory, (Wiley, New York, 1986); (b) T. Clark, A Handbook of Computational Chemistry, (Wiley, New York, 1985; (c) U. Burkert, N.L. Allinger, Molecular Mechanics (ACS Monograph #177, 1982).Google Scholar
2. Jorgensen, W.L, Blake, J.F., Madura, J.D., Wierschke, S.G., Supercomputer Research in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, (ACS Symposium Series #353, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Scheraga, H.A. and Maxfield, F.R, Biochemistry, 15, 5138, (1976).Google Scholar
4. Wierschke, S.G., Chandrasekhar, J. and Jorgensen, W.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 1496, (1985).Google Scholar
5. Crist, B., Oddershede, J., Sabin, J.R., Perram, J.W. and Ratner, M.A., J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Phys. Ed., 22, 881, (1984).Google Scholar
6. Stewart, J.J.P., MOPAC, QCPE Program #455.Google Scholar
7. Dewar, M.J.S., Zoebisch, E.G., Healy, E.F. and Stewart, J.J.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 3902, (1985).Google Scholar
8. Stewart, J.J.P., New Polym. Materials, 1, 53, (1987).Google Scholar
9. Perkins, P.G. and Stewart, J.J.P., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II, 76, 520, (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Klei, H.E. and Stewart, J.J.P., Int. J. Quant. Chem., Quant. Chem. Symp., 20, 529, (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Adams, W.W., Kumar, S., Baker, K.N. and Fratini, A.V., unpublished results.Google Scholar
12. Dewar, M.J.S and Thiele, W., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99, 4899, (1977).Google Scholar
13. Adams, W.W., Lenhart, P.G., Eby, R.K., Arsenovic, P., unpublished results.Google Scholar
14. Wierschke, S.G., AFWAL-TR-87-4034, (July 1987).Google Scholar
15. Ref. [1], p. 64.Google Scholar
16. Ref. [1], p. 65.Google Scholar