Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:44:01.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison between thermal and deformation-induced structural relaxation in atomic glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Magesh Nandagopal
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs CT 06269, USA
Marcel Utz
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs CT 06269, USA Department of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs CT 06269, USA
Get access

Abstract

Plastic yielding in glassy solids has been interpreted as a strain-biased relaxation process, or, equivalently, as a strain-induced glass transition. In the present work, the atomic motions caused by athermal plastic deformation of a binary Lennard-Jones glass are compared to thermal motion in the liquid in terms of the self part of the intermediate structure factor. We find that like at finite temperature, athermal plastic deformation leads to diffusive atomic motion at all length scales beyond about one interatomic distance, effectively promoting structural relaxation. The present approach allows to study the interplay of deformation-induced and thermal relaxation. Preliminary evidence is presented that these two processes occur independently of each other over a wide range of strain rates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Cottrell, A. H., Dislocations and plastic flow in crystals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1953).Google Scholar
[2] Newman, S. J., J. Polym. Sci. 27, 563 (1958).Google Scholar
[3] Marshall, I. and Thompson, A. B., Proc. R. Soc. London A221, 541 (1954).Google Scholar
[4] Lazurkin, J. S., J. Polym. Sci. 30, 595 (1958).Google Scholar
[5] Robertson, R. E., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 7, 443 (1963).Google Scholar
[6] Khonik, V., Kosilov, A., Mikhailov, V., and Sviridov, V., Acta Mat. 46, 3399 (1998).Google Scholar
[7] Berthier, L., Barrat, J.-L., and Kurchan, J., Phys. Rev. E 61, 5464 (2000).Google Scholar
[8] Yamamoto, R. and Onuki, A., J. Chem. Phys. 117, 2359 (2003).Google Scholar
[9] Barrat, J.-L. and Berthier, L., Phys. Rev. E 63, 012503/1 (2001).Google Scholar
[10] Malandro, D. L. and Lacks, D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5576 (1998).Google Scholar
[11] Liu, A. L. and Nagel, S. R., Nature 396, 21 (1998).Google Scholar
[12] Berthier, L. and Barrat, J.-L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 095702/1 (2003).Google Scholar
[13] Berthier, L. and Barrat, J.-L., J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6228 (2003).Google Scholar
[14] Weber, T. A. and Stillinger, F. H., Phys. Rev. B 32, 5402 (1985).Google Scholar
[15] Kob, W. and Andersen, H. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1376 (1994).Google Scholar
[16] Kob, W. and Andersen, H. C., Phys. Rev. E 51, 4626 (1995).Google Scholar
[17] Kob, W. and Andersen, H. C., Phys. Rev. E 52, 4134 (1995).Google Scholar
[18] Sastry, S., Debenedetti, P. G., and Stillinger, F. H., Nature 393, 554 (1998).Google Scholar
[19] Maeda, K. and Takeuchi, S., J. Phys. F 12, 2767 (1982).Google Scholar
[20] Malandro, D. L. and Lacks, D. J., J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4593 (1999).Google Scholar
[21] Mott, P. H., Argon, A. S., and Suter, U. W., Phil. Mag. A 67, 931 (1993).Google Scholar
[22] Hutnik, M., Argon, A. S., and Suter, U. W., Macromolecules 26, 1097 (1993).Google Scholar
[23] Lacks, D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5385 (1998).Google Scholar
[24] Nandagopal, M. and Utz, M., submitted for publication, (2003).Google Scholar
[25] Utz, M., Debenedetti, P. G., and Stillinger, F. H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1471 (2000).Google Scholar
[26] Hasan, O. A. and Boyce, M. C., Polymer 34, 5085 (1993).Google Scholar
[27] Tervoort, T. A., Ph.D. thesis, Technical University Eindhoven (1996).Google Scholar
[28] Kob, W., Donati, C., Plimpton, S. J., Poole, P. H., and Glotzer, S. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2827 (1997).Google Scholar