Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comparative Study of trap levels observed in undoped and Si-doped GaN

  • C. B. Soh (a1), D. Z. Chi (a1), H. F. Lim (a1) and S. J. Chua (a1) (a2)

Abstract

In this paper, deep level defects in undoped and Si–doped GaN have been studied using digital deep level transient spectroscopy. Common trap levels at Ec -ET ∼ 0.15-0.20 eV and 0.59-0.62 eV were detected for both undoped and Si-doped samples. For the doped samples, three additional defect levels at Ec -Et ∼ 0.11, 0.28, and 0.45 eV were detected. The concentration of the 0.15-0.20 eV was found to be much higher in undoped GaN that also shows higher dislocation density. Based on this correlation and the logarithmic capture behavior observed for this level, indicative of extended defect nature, we attribute the 0.15-0.20 eV level to dislocation related defects. On the other hand, the 0.28 and 0.45eV trap levels are tentatively attributed to Sirelated defects simply due to the fact that these two levels were observed only in Si-doped GaN. The 0.11eV trap level, which exhibits an exponential capture kinetic, is believed to be related to nitrogen vacancies.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Zhang, X; Chua S, J; Liu, W & Li, P, Phys. Stat. Sol. Vol.216, No.307, pp307309, (1999).
2. Nakamura, S., Senoh, M., Nagahama, S., Iwasa, N., Yamada, T., Matsushita, T., Kiyoka, H., and Sugimoto, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 35, L74, 1996.
3. Rosner, S. J., Carr, E. C., Ludowise, M. J., Girolami, G., and Erikson, H. I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, p.420 (1997).
4. Fang, Z-Q., Hemsky, J.W., Look, D.C., and Mack, M.P., Appl Phys. Lett. 72, p.448, (1998).
5. Hierro, A., Ringel, S. A., Hansen, M., Speck, J. S., Mishra, U. K. and DenBaars, S. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 14991501 (2000).
6. Gotz, W., Johnson, N.M., Amano, H., Akasaki, I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, p.463465 (1994).
7. Hacke, P., Detchprohm, T., Hiramatsu, K., Sawaki, N., J. Appl. Phys, 76, p.304309, (1994).
8. Wosinski, T., J. Appl. Phys, 65, p1566 (1989).
9. Omling, P., Samuelson, L. and Grimmeiss, H.G., J. Appl. Phys, 54, p.51175122, (1983).
10. Chatterjee, B. and Ringel, S.A., J. Appl. Phys, 77, p.38853898, (1995).
11. Castaldini, A., Cavallini, A and Polenta, L., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 12, p1016110167, (2000).
12. Look, D.C., Reynolds, D.C., Hemsky, J.W., Sizelove, J.R., Jones, R.L., and Molnar, R.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, p.2273, (1997).
13. Lee, W.I., Huang, T.C., Guo, J.D., Feng, M.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, p.17211723 (1995).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Comparative Study of trap levels observed in undoped and Si-doped GaN

  • C. B. Soh (a1), D. Z. Chi (a1), H. F. Lim (a1) and S. J. Chua (a1) (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.