Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:58:54.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Copper in Glycerol Based Slurries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

K. S. Kumar  and
S. P. Murarka
K. S. Kumar
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Electronics and Electronics Manufacturing, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180
S. P. Murarka
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Electronics and Electronics Manufacturing, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180
Get access

Abstract

The development of a reliable/reproducible chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) process to planarize and define copper using a dual damascene approach is essential for introducing copper as the interconnection metal. In this paper we present results of a new polishing slurry containing glycerol and Al2O3 abrasive. The slurry is a near-neutral medium and does not have the effect of acidic or basic slurries on copper. The effect of glycerol concentration and the abrasive size on the CMP behavior is investigated. The changes in the slurry temperature, pH, viscosity, dielectric constant and surface tension were examined as a function of the glycerol concentration. The results, indicating a strong dependence on both the glycerol concentration and the abrasive size, are explained on the basis of viscosity and dielectric constant of the solution and the van der waal forces and the electrostatic repulsion between the particles.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 427: Symposium K – Advanced Metallization for Future ULSI , 1996 , 237
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cook, L. M., J. Non-crystalline solids 120, p. 152 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Murarka, S.P., Steigerwald, J., and Gutmann, R.J., MRS Bulletin XVII, p. 46 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Steigerwald, J. M., Murarka, S. P., Duquette, D. J. and Gutmann, R. J. in ”Advanced Metallization for Devices and Circuits - Science, Technology and Manufacturing”, Eds. Murarka, S. P., Katz, A., Tu, K. N. and Maex, K. (MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994) p. 133.Google Scholar
4. Suba is a registered trademark of Rodel.Google Scholar
5. Steigerwald, J. M., Murarka, S. P., Duquette, D. J. and Gutmann, R. J., J. of Electrochem. Soc., 141, 3512 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Newman, A. A., ”Glycerol”, CRC press, Cleveland, p. 15–29 (1968).Google Scholar
7. Viscosity changes of water-glycerol mixtures have been measured as a function of temperature.(6) For 25 wt % glycerol the viscosity (in centipoise) changes from ∼1.9 at 25°C to ∼1.6 at 30°C. For 15 wt % glycerol the same increase in temperature changes viscosity from 1.4 to 1.2 centipoise. For pure water and pure glycerol the relative viscosity changes (in centipoise) are 0.9 and 1010 at 25°C to 0.8 and 612 at 30°C.Google Scholar
8. Cuthrell, R. E., J. Appl. Phys., 49, 432 (1978).Google Scholar
9. Westwood, A. R. C. and Macmillian, N. H., in ”Science of Hardness Testing”, (ASM Metals Park, OH, 1973), p. 377.Google Scholar
10. Perry, N. R. H. and Chilton, C. H., Eds., ”Chemical Engineers Handbook”, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973) p. 17.Google Scholar
11. Parks, G.A., Chem. Rev., 65, 177 (1965).Google Scholar
12. Podzimek, O., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng., (1987), p. 221–225.Google Scholar
13. Podzimek, O., Proc. of NASA Conf. at U. Twente, NASA Report WB-85-16, B8664575 (Apr. 1986).Google Scholar
14. Bird, R. Byron, Stewart, E. and Lightfort, E. N., 'Transport Phenomenon”, (John Wiley and Sons, NY, 1994)p. 514.Google Scholar
15. Israelchivili, Jacob, ”Intermolecular and Surface Forces”. Google Scholar