Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Characterization of the Crack Propagation in the API X-52 and API X-65 Steels into Cathodic Protection

  • A. Aguilar (a1), R. Esparza (a1), M.A. Gil (a2), L.F. Cuahutitla (a2), E. Rubio-Rosas (a2), V. Rodríguez-Lugo (a2) and R. Perez (a1)...

Abstract

Cathodic protection has been applied for many years as the best method to prevent the corrosion in systems which transported hydrocarbon pipelines. However, it has found the presence of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in steel pipelines with high concentrations of carbonates and bicarbonates with pH final (9 to 11). The resistance to the stress corrosion cracking of the API X-52 and API X-65 steels was evaluated on compact modified wedge opening specimens (WOL). The specimens were loaded of 95% of the yield strength. The resistance of crack propagation and the corrosion rate were evaluated with different applied potentials (-850 and -650 mV), this with respect to a saturated copper/copper sulfate reference electrode. The used electrolytes were simulated soils (carbonate-bicarbonate solution). Evidence of crack propagation of the API X-52 and API X-65 steels were carried out by scanning electron microscopy. The obtained result showed susceptibility to SCC on specimens with cathodic protection. The cathodic protection applied (-850 mV vs Cu/CuSO4 electrode) decreases considerably the corrosion rate on the evaluated steels. In this work the loaded stress showed to be a very important variable on the susceptibility to SCC.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Ferreira, C.A.M., Ponciano, J.A.C., Santiago Vaitsman, D., Vidal Pérez, D., Science of the Total Environment 1, 250 (2007).
2. Osella, Ana, Favetto, Alicia, Journal of Applied Geophysics 44, 303 (2000).
3. Delafosse, D., Magnin, T., Engineering Fracture Mechanics 68, 693 (2001).
4. Parking, R.W. Predictive approach to stress corrosion cracking. In: Gangloff RP, Ives MB, Editors. Environment induced cracking of metals, NACE, Houston Texas, 1990. p. 1
5. Asher, S.L., Leis, B., Colwell, J., and Singh, P.M, Corrosion Science 49, 932 (2007).
6. Novak, S.R. and Rolfe, S.T., J. Mat. 4, 701 (1969).
7. Deans, W.F. and Richards, C.E., J. Testing Eval. 7, 147 (1979).
8. Lu, T. and Luo, J., Corrosion Science 44, 1695 (2002).
9. Perdomo, J.J., Morales, J.L. and Viloria, A., Lusinchi, A.J., Materials Performance 41, 55 (2002).
10. Knott, J.F.: Hydrogen Effects on Material Behavior, Conf. Proc., Moran. WY. 1990,
Moody, N.R. and Thompson, A.W., eds., TMS-ASME, Warrendale, PA, 1990, pp. 661–75.
11. Kentish, P.J., Corrosion 20, 139 (1985).
12. Beavers, J.A., Jaskece, C.E., CORROSION/98, NACE Inter, Houston, TX, 1998, Paper No. 304.
13. Parkins, R.N, CORROSION/2000, NACE Inter, Houston, TX, 2000, Paper No. 363.
14. Chen, W., King, F., Vokes, E., Corrosion 58 (2002) 267.

Characterization of the Crack Propagation in the API X-52 and API X-65 Steels into Cathodic Protection

  • A. Aguilar (a1), R. Esparza (a1), M.A. Gil (a2), L.F. Cuahutitla (a2), E. Rubio-Rosas (a2), V. Rodríguez-Lugo (a2) and R. Perez (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed