Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T06:37:09.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Change in Bioavailability of Organic Matter Associatedwith Clay-Based Buffer Materials as a Result of Heat Andradiation Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

S. Stroes-Gascoyne ,
S. A. Haveman  and
P. Vilks
S. Stroes-Gascoyne
Affiliation:
AECL, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO.
S. A. Haveman
Affiliation:
AECL, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO.
P. Vilks
Affiliation:
AECL, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, ROE ILO.
Get access

Abstract

Compacted clay-based buffer surrounds corrosion-resistant waste containers in the Canadian concept for nuclear fuel waste disposal. Clays naturally contain small quantities of organic matter that may be resistant to bacterial degradation. The containers with highly radioactive material would subject the surrounding buffer to both heat (max. 95°C) and radiation (max. 52 Gy/h). Both could potentially break down complex organic material to smaller, more bioavailable compounds. This could stimulate microbial growth and possibly affect gas production, microbially-influenced corrosion or radionuclide migration. Experiments were carried out in which buffer (50 wt.% Na-bentonite, 50 wt.% sand) was heated at 60 and 90°C for periods of 2, 4 and 6 weeks, in some cases followed by irradiation to 25 kGy. Unheated buffer was also irradiated to 25 and 50 kGy at different moisture contents. The treated materials were subsequently suspended in distilled water, shaken for 24 h and centrifuged to remove the solids. The 0.22 μm filter-sterilized leachates were inoculated with equal volumes of fresh groundwater and incubated at room temperature for 10 d to determine the increase in total and viable bacteria compared to a groundwater control. Results indicated that leachates from buffer subjected to heat, radiation or combinations of these, had a stimulating effect on both total and viable cell counts in groundwater, compared to unamended groundwater controls. This stimulating effect was generally most pronounced for viable counts and could be larger than two orders of magnitude. Leachates from untreated buffer material also stimulated the growth of groundwater bacteria, but to a lesser extent than leachates from heat-and radiation-treated buffer material. The effects of heat and radiation on nutrient availability in clay-based sealing materials (at relevant clay/moisture ratios) should, therefore, be taken into account when attempting to quantify the effects of microbial activity on vault performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 465: Symposium II – Scienfific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX , 1996 , 987
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Atomie Energy of Canada Limited Report AECL-10711, COG-93–1 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Stroes-Gascoyne, S. and West, J.M., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10808, COG-93–54 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Stotzky, G., in Interactions of soil minerals with natural organics and microbes, Edited by Huang, P.M. and Schnitzer, M., (1986), pp. 305–428. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
4. Nedwell, D.B., FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 45, 47–52 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Skjemstad, J.O., Clarke, P., Raylor, J.A., Oades, J.M. and McClure, S.G., Aust. J. Soil Res. 34, 251–271 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Bunzle, K. and Schimmack, W., Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 27, 165–176 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Korenevich, N.L., Tr. VNIITP 53, 141–148 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Senesi, N., Chen, Y. and Schnitzer, M., Fuel 56, 171–176 (1977).Google Scholar
9. Groneman, A.G., in Proc. Radiation for Pollution Abatement. European Society of Nuclear Methods in Agriculture, Munich, 107 (1976).Google Scholar
10. Yamazaki, M., Sawai, T. and Sawai, T., Radiât. Phys. Chem. 20, 329–332 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Dahl, J., Hallberg, R. and Kaplan, I.R., Org. Geochem. 12, 559–571 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Bovey, F.A., The effects of ionizing radiation on natural and synthetic polymers. Wiley Interscience, New York, 1958, 287 pp.Google Scholar
13. Fukunaga, S., Fujiki, K. and Asano, H., Abstract for 1993 International Symposium on Subsurface Microbiology (ISSM-93), Bath U.K. Sept. 19–24, 1993.Google Scholar
14. Haveman, S.A., Stroes-Gascoyne, S. and Hamon, C.J., Atomic Energy Of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-654*, COG-94–488 (1995).Google Scholar
15. ASTM., in Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Vol. 11.02 Water (II). 632–635. Method D4455–85. ASTM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (1990).Google Scholar
16. Haveman, S.A., Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Hamon, C.J. and Delaney, T.L., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-677*, COG-95–017 (1995b).Google Scholar