Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T10:00:32.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Challenges and Rewards of Low-Abrasive Copper CMP: Evaluation and Integration for Single-Damascene Cu/Low-k Interconnects for the 90nm Node

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Christopher L. Borst
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments Incorporated Kilby Center 13560 North Central Expressway Dallas, TX 75243U.S.A email: c-borst1@ti.com
Stanley M. Smith
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments Incorporated Kilby Center 13560 North Central Expressway Dallas, TX 75243, U.S.A
Mona Eissa
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments Incorporated Kilby Center 13560 North Central Expressway Dallas, TX 75243, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

Low-abrasive content slurries for copper (Cu) chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP) have been developed to achieve removal rate and removal uniformity comparable to conventional slurries. They can improve post-CMP defectivity, improve topography and allow operation at lower polish pressures that are more compatible with the low-dielectric constant (low-k) materials required for current and future high-performance interconnects. Integration of these slurries into a yielding product with 9-level Cu/low-k metallization requires fundamental learning and process characterization. This paper discusses the some of the challenges encountered during development, integration, and qualification of a low-abrasive Cu CMP process for Texas Instruments (TI) Incorporated's 90 nm technology node with copper/organosilicate interconnect. As abrasive content is reduced, the slurry chemistry must play a larger role in CMP removal. A more aggressive reactive chemical formulation requires an effective inhibitive component to keep Cu static etch rate low. As a result, wafer-scale process and consumable interactions, die-scale planarization efficiency, and feature-scale removal rates each become more sensitive to process changes. Pressure and temperature have larger effects on removal rate/profile than conventional slurries, and complete clearing of Cu puddled over underlying topography becomes more difficult. Successful integration of these slurries, however, can achieve excellent results in dishing and erosion topography, Cu thickness uniformity, and Cu loss in small features such as vias and landing pads. Low-abrasive content solutions are also more stable and easy to handle in slurry distribution vessels and lines, have lower scratch and residue defectivity, and have greatly extended margin for overpolish. As lowabrasive content Cu slurry options continue to evolve to become manufacturable solutions, their benefits far outweigh the costs and challenges encountered in their successful integration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Singh, R. K., Bajaj, R. et al. , Advances in Chemical-Mechanical Planarization, MRS Bulletin, 27 (10) 746 (2002).Google Scholar
[2] Singh, R. K., Lee, S.-M., Choi, K.-S., Basim, G. B., Choi, W., Chen, Z., and Moudgil, B. M., Fund. of Slurry Design for CMP of Metal and Dielectric Materials, MRS Bulletin, 27 (10) 753 (2002).Google Scholar
[3] Steigerwald, J. M., Murarka, S. P., and Gutmann, R. J., Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1997).Google Scholar
[4] Jindal, A., Hedge, S., and Babu, S. V., Chemical Mechanical Polishing Using Mixed Abrasive Slurries, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 5 (7) G48 (2002).Google Scholar
[5] Guo, L. and Subramanian, R. S., Mechanical Removal in CMP of Copper Using Alumina Abrasives, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 151 (2) G104 (2004).Google Scholar
[6] Borst, C. L., Gutmann, R. J., and Gill, W. N., Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Low Dielectric Constant Polymers and Organosilicate Glasses, Kluwer, Boston (2002).Google Scholar
[7] Hanazono, M., Amanokura, J., and Kamigata, Y., Development and Application of an Abrasive-Free Polishing Solution for Copper, MRS Bulletin, 27 (10) 772 (2002).Google Scholar
[8] Matsuda, T., Takahashi, H., Tsurugaya, M., Miyazaki, K., Doy, T. K., and Kinoshita, M., Characteristics of Abrasive-Free Micelle Slurry for Cu CMP, Journal of the Electrochem Society, 150 (9) G532 (2003).Google Scholar
[9] Kondo, S., Sakuma, N., Homma, Y., Goto, Y., Ohashi, N., Yamaguchi, H., and Owada, N., Abrasive-Free Polishing for Cu Damascene Interconnection, Journal of the Electrochem Society, 147 (10) 3907 (2000).Google Scholar
[10] Kim, A. T., Seok, J., Tichy, J. A., and Cale, T. S., A Multiscale Elastohydrodynamic Contact Model for CMP, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 150 (9) G576 (2003).Google Scholar
[11] Baker, A. R., The Origin of the Edge Effect in Chemical Mechanical Planarization, ECS Fall Meeting, San Antonio, TX (1996).Google Scholar
[12] Paul, E. and Vacassy, R., A Model of CMP: III. Inhibitors, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 150 (12) G739 (2003).Google Scholar
[13] Smith, T. et al. , More Than Density: Pattern Dependencies in the Copper Era, Proceedings of the VMIC, Marina Del Ray, CA (2003).Google Scholar