Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:43:55.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbon Nanotube-Based Fluid Flow/Shear Sensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Chi-Nung Ni
Affiliation:
cni@ucsd.edu, U. of California, San Diego, Materials Science and Engineering, R273, EBU 2, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States
Christian P. Deck
Affiliation:
cdeck@ucsd.edu, U. of California, San Diego, Materials Science and Engineering, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States
Kenneth S Vecchio
Affiliation:
kvecchio@UCSD.Edu, U. of California, San Diego, Materials Science and Engineering, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States
Prabhakar R Bandaru
Affiliation:
pbandaru@ucsd.edu, U. of California, San Diego, Materials Science and Engineering, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States
Get access

Abstract

The response of vertically oriented multi-walled nanotubes (MWNTs) to fluid flows forms a basis for monitoring shear forces at the nanoscale. We report on the modulation of polarized light transmission through a MWNT mat, as a function of the nanotube axis relative to the laser polarization. Nanotubes are deflected under fluid flow, with fluid pressures corresponding to pico-Newton range forces. This deflection is measured as a function of transmitted laser light intensity. While the response of the CNTs to the flows could be modeled through standard elastic beam deflection theory, their recovery, after the force removal, invokes viscoelastic behavior due to CNT disentanglement. The fluid flow direction, as well as its pressure, can also be determined by monitoring the change in transmitted laser polarization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Treacy, M. M. J., Ebbesen, T. W. and Gibson, J. M., Nature, 381, 678 (1996)Google Scholar
2. Baughman, R. H., Zakhidov, A. A. and Heer, W. A. d., Science, 297, 787 (2002)Google Scholar
3. Sazonova, V., Yaish, Y., Ustunel, H., Roundy, D., Arias, T. A. and McEuen, P. L., Nature, 431, 284 (2004)Google Scholar
4. Falvo, M. R., Clary, G. J., Taylor, R. M. II, Chi, V., Brooks, F. P. Jr, Washburn, S. and Superfine, R, Nature, 389, 582 (1997)Google Scholar
5. Nardelli, M. B., Yakobson, B. I. and Bernholc, J., Physical Review Letters, 81, 4656 (1998)Google Scholar
6. Deck, C. P. and Vecchio, K., Carbon, 43, 2608 (2005)Google Scholar
7. Murakami, Y., Einarsson, E., Edamura, T. and Maruyama, S., Physical Review Letters, 94, 087402 (2005)Google Scholar
8. Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R. J. and DeWolf, J. T., Mechanics of Materials, McGraw-Hill Companies, Boston, (2001)Google Scholar
9. Young, R. J. and Lovell, P. A., Introduction to Polymers, Chapman & Hall, New York, (1991)Google Scholar
10. Deck, C. P., Flowers, J., McKee, G. S. B. and Vecchio, K., Journal of Applied Physics, 101, 023512 (2007)Google Scholar
11. Stampfer, C., Helbling, T., Obergfell, D., Schoberle, B., Tripp, M. K., Jungen, A., Roth, S., Bright, V. M. and Hierold, C., Nano Letters, 6, 233 (2006)Google Scholar