Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-17T17:24:31.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calculating Barriers to Oxygen Penetration on Metal Oxides with the Effective-Medium Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Maria Ronay  and
Peter Nordlander
Maria Ronay
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, 10598
Peter Nordlander
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, N.J. 08855
Get access

Abstract

We estimated surface penetration barriers for interstitial oxygen using a simple calculational scheme, the effective-medium theory for a single atom. In this theory the single parameter describing the host is the electron density. Since the electron density depends primarily on the interatomic distances, i.e. the structure of the host, we found that the barrier to oxygen penetration in oxides depends primarily on the structure of the oxide, the closest-packed isotropic oxides with the smallest lattice constants having the highest barriers.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 141: Symposium T – Atomic Scale Calculations in Materials Science , 1988 , 279
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Norskov, J.K., and Lang, N.D., Phys. Rev. B, 21, 2131 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Norskov, J.K., Phys. Rev. B, 26, 2875 (1982).Google Scholar
3. a) Nordlander, P., Holloway, S. and Norskov, J.K., Surf. Sci., 136, 59 (1984).Google Scholar
b) Norskov, I.K., Phys. Rev. Let., 48, 1620 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
c) Norskov, J.K., Besenbacher, F., Bottinger, J., Nielsen, B.B. and Pisarev, A.A., Phys. Rev. Let., 49, 142 (1982).Google Scholar
d) Puska, M., Nieminen, R.M., Manninen, M., Chakraborty, Bulbul, Holloway, S. and Norskov, J.K., Phys. Rev. Let., 51, 1081 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Manninen, M., Norskov, J.K. and Umrigar, Cyrus, J. Phys. F. 12, L7 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Puska, M.J., Nieminen, R.M., and Manninen, M., Phys. Rev. B, 24, 3037 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Bulbul Chakraborty, Holloway, S., and Norskov, J.K., Surf. Sci., 152/153, 660 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Nordlander, P. and Ronay, Maria,: Phys. Rev. B, 36, 4982 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Dederichs, P.H. and Leibfried, G., Phys. Rev., 188, 1175 (1969).Google Scholar
9. Tewary, V.K., Adv. Phys. 22, 757 (1973).Google Scholar
10. Nordlander, P., Norskov, J.K. and Besenbacher, F., J. Phys. F:, 16, 1161 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Maria Ronay and Nordlander, P., Phys. Rev.B, 35, 9403 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Yansen Wang, Nordlander, P., Wei, Siqing and Ronay, Maria, Defect and Diffusion Forum, 61, xxx (1988).Google Scholar
13. Maria Ronay and Nordlander, P., Physica C 153–155, 834 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Maria Ronay and Nordlander, P., to be published in Defect and Diffusion Forum.Google Scholar