Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:33:24.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biomimetic Mineralization of an Aligned, Self-Assembled Collagenous Matrix.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

David Christiansen
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854
Frederick H. Silver
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854
Get access

Abstract

An in-vitro method of mineralizing an aligned, self-assembled collagenous matrix is presented. Reconstituted collagen fibers were mineralized by exposure to saturated solutions of calcium and phosphate of varying pH in a double diffusion chamber for seven days at room temperature. Microscopic investigation of the mineral precipitate within the fibers indicate the formation of hydroxyapatite crystals with features comparable to mineral observed in bone and avian tendon. Mechanical test results indicate that tensile strength and tangent modulus increase after mineralization in comparison to unmineralized control fibers. These results suggest that mineralization of collagen fiber in-vitro may parallel some of the events seen in mineralization of bone and turkey tendon. In addition, mineralized collagen fibers may be useful in the design of composites for the replacement or augmentation of hard tissue

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Arsenault, A. L., Frankland, B. W., and Ottensmeyer, F. P., Calcified Tissue International, 48, 46, (1991).Google Scholar
2. Howell, D. S., Pita, J. C., Marquez, J. F., and Madruga, J. E., Journal of Clinical Investigation, 42, 1121, (1968).Google Scholar
3. Hukins, D. W. L., in Calcified Tissue, edited by Hukins, D. W. L., (CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida, 1989), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kato, Y. P., Christiansen, D. L., Hahn, R. A., Sheih, S.-J., Goldstein, J. D., and Silver, F. H., Biomaterials, 10, 38, (1989).Google Scholar
5. Kokubo, T., Ito, S., Huang, Z. T., Hayashi, T., Sakka, S., Kitsugi, T., and Yamamuro, T., Journal Biomedical Materials Research, 24, 331, (1990).Google Scholar
6. Landis, W. J. and Glimcher, M. J., Journal of Ultrastructural Research, 63, 188, (1978).Google Scholar
7. Mann, S., Nature, 332, 119, (1988).Google Scholar
8. Nakamura, O., Fink, D. J., and Caplan, A.I., in Materials Synthesis Based On Biological Processes, edited by Alper, M., Calvert, P., Frankel, R., Rieke, P., and Tirrell, D., (Materials Research Society Proceedings, 218, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1991) p. 275.Google Scholar
9. Simmons, D. J. and Grynpas, M. D., in Bone Volume 1: The Osteoblast and Osteocyte, edited by Hall, B. K., (The Telford Press, New Jersey, 1990) p. 193.Google Scholar
10. Valhmu, W. B., Wu, L. N. Y., and Wuthier, R. E., Bone and Mineral, 8, 195, (1990).Google Scholar
11. Weiner, S. and Price, P. A., Calcified Tissue International, 39, 365, (1986).Google Scholar