Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T08:40:02.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomic Structure of the Epitaxial Al/Si Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

F. K. LeGoues
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center. Yorktown Heights, New York 10598. USA
W. Krakow
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center. Yorktown Heights, New York 10598. USA
P. S. Ho
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center. Yorktown Heights, New York 10598. USA
Get access

Abstract

Al was deposited on Si(l l l) and observed by cross-sectional electron microscopy, both in the annealed and as deposited states. It is shown that Al is strongly textured when deposited on Si(111), with Al(111)//Si(111) and AI<110>//Si<110> or AI(100)//Si(111) and AI<I10>//Si<110>. Annealed samples are completely epitaxial with A1(111)//Si(111) and A1<110>//Si<110>. Lattices imaging of the interfaces shows an amorphous layer (native Si oxide) between Al and Si, in the as-deposited case. The two lattices are in contact only at pinholes in the native oxide and fringes on both sides of the interface are seen to be continuous through the interface only at those points. Annealed samples do not show any amorphous or disordered layer at the interface: The two lattices are completely in contact, with lattice fringes extending from one side of the interface to the other. An atomic model of the annealed interface, based on energy considerations and consistent with TEM observations, is proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Louie, S. G. and Cohen, M. L., Phys. Rev. B, 13, 2461, (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Pearson, W. B., Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals and Alloys, Pergamon Press, (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. d'Heurle, F., Berenbaumand, L. Rosenberg, R., Trans. AIME, 242, 502, (1968)Google Scholar
4. Westmacott, K. H. and Dahmen, U., Proceedings of the 40th Annual EMSA Meeting, 620, (1982)Google Scholar
5. Lander, J. J. and Morrison, J., Surf. Sci., 2, 553, 1964Google Scholar
6. Strongtin, M., Kammerer, O. F., Farrell, H. H. and Miller, D. L., 129, (1972)Google Scholar
7. Zur, A. and McGill, T. C., J. Appl. Phys., 55, 378, 1984 Google Scholar
8. Cherns, D., Smith, D. A., Krakow, W. and Batson, P. E., Phil. Mag., 45, (1982), 107 Google Scholar
9. Krakow, W., Thin Sol. Films, 93, (1982), 109125 Google Scholar
10. LeGoues, F. K., Krakow, W. and Ho, P. S., to be publishedGoogle Scholar