Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:54:24.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Angle-Resolved Photoemission Study of The Electronic Structures of Auai1 and Ptga2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L.-S. Hsu ,
J. D. Denlinger  and
J. W. Allen
L.-S. Hsu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, National Chang-Hua University of Education, Chung-Hua, Taiwan, ROC
J. D. Denlinger
Affiliation:
Randall Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–1120, USA
J. W. Allen
Affiliation:
Randall Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109–1120, USA
Get access

Abstract

In this work, in-situ doped polysilicon and poly-SiGe films have been used as the gate material for the fabrication of MOS devices to evaluate their respective performances. These films were deposited in an RTCVD system using a Si2H6 and GeH4 gas mixture. MOS capacitors with 45 Å thick gate oxides and polysilicon/poly-SiGe gates were subjected to different anneals to study boron penetration. SIMS analysis and flat band voltage measurements showed much lower boron penetration for devices with poly-SiGe gates than for devices with polysilicon gates. In addition, C-V measurements showed no poly depletion effects for poly-SiGe gates while polysilicon gates had a depletion effect of about 8%. A comparison of resistivities of these films showed a low resistivity of 1 mΩ-cm for poly-SiGe films versus 3 mΩ-cm for polysilicon films after an anneal at 950 °C for 30 seconds.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 524: Symposium V – Application of Synchrotron Radiation Techniques…IV , 1998 , 179
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hahn, R. E. and Seraphin, B. O., Phys. Thin Films 10, 1 (1978).Google Scholar
2. Kim, Y. K., Baugh, D. A., Shuh, D. K., Williams, R. S., Sadwick, L. P., and Wang, K. L., J. Mater. Res. 5, 2139 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Hsu, L.-S., Mod. Phys. Lett. B 8, 1297 (1994), and References therein.Google Scholar
4. Hsu, L.-S. and Tsang, K.-L., Phys. Rev. B 56, 6615 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Denlinger, J. D. et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1342 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Egelhoff, W. F., Jr, Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 16, 213 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Nelson, J.G., Gignac, W. J., Kim, S., Lince, J. R., and Williams, R. S., Phys. Rev. B 31, 3469 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Kim, K. J., Harmon, B. N., Chen, L.-Y., and Lynch, D. W., Phys. Rev. B 42, 8813 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Switendick, A. C. and Narath, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1423 (1969).Google Scholar
10. Kim, S., Nelson, J. G., and Williams, R. S., Phys. Rev. B 31, 3460 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Gupta, A. and Sen Gupta, R., Phys. Stat. Sol. B 168, 455 (1991).Google Scholar