Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T22:56:21.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of Copper to Tantalum Transition in Copper Cmp

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2011

J.M. Kang
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics, DSIC-MD, 11 Science Park Road, Singapore
S. Wu
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics, DSIC-MD, 11 Science Park Road, Singapore
T. Selvaraj
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics, DSIC-MD, 11 Science Park Road, Singapore
P.D. Foo
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics, DSIC-MD, 11 Science Park Road, Singapore
Get access

Abstract

The evolution from Cu to Ta surface during Cu CMP has been investigated. As a first step of Cu CMP, removing excess Cu on field area to Ta often gives rise to topography issues such as dishing or erosion. The exposure of Ta is detected by in-situ reflectance measurement, where the downward slope-start signifies the beginning of Ta exposure. For blanket wafers, the maximum remaining Cu thickness at slope-start increases with initial Cu thickness. Applying lower polishing pressure and table speed, so-called soft landing, near the Cu-Ta transition stage results in thicker remaining Cu. In patterned wafers, Ta exposure starts near high pattern density areas such as wide lines, and contrary to blanket wafers, remaining Cu thickness at slope-start cannot be correlated simply with initial Cu thickness. In this experiment, with increasing initial Cu thickness, remaining Cu thickness at slope-start decreased. The amount of dishing is largely proportional to the initial Cu thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Renteln, P. and Ninh, T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 566, pp. 155160 (2000)10.1557/PROC-566-155Google Scholar
2. Yang, K., Proc. 5th CMP-MIC, Santa Clara, CA, pp. 2332 (2000)Google Scholar
3. Nguyen, V., VanKraneburg, H. and Woerlee, P., Microelectronic Eng. 50, 403 (2000)Google Scholar
4. Burke, P.A., Proc. 8th VMIC, Santa Clara, CA, pp. 379384 (1991)Google Scholar