Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:05:22.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Etch-Back Planarization Process Using A Sacrificial Polymide Layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

J. R. Lothian
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
T. R. Fullowan
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Get access

Abstract

An etch-back polymide planarization process for the emitter contact of AlGaAs/GaAs HBTs using PC-1500 is presented. The degree of surface topography has a major impact on the yield in HBT fabrication. A planarization process using a spin-on sacrificial layer to produce a planar interlevel dielectric layer would be very beneficial in allowing thicker and more uniform emitter contacts therefore enhancing the yield and current handling capability. The PC-1500 polymer flows at 200°C and provides a much better planarity than regular photoresist. For patterns from -3 μm to 250 this polymer can achieve 80% to 92% planarity. The wafers were etched in a parallel plate, single wafer reactive ion-etching system with a mixture of oxygen and Freon-14. The etch rate of this polymer increased with the oxygen content of the discharge then became fairly constant at high O2 concentrations while the etch rate of the underlying dielectric film (SiN) was proportional to the Freon 14 content. This new polymer shows little loading effect. A 1:1 etch rate ratio of SiN to PC-1500 was established for good planarity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ghandhi, S. K., “VLSI Fabrication Principles,” pp.425 John Wiley and Sons, New York 1983.Google Scholar
2. Kao, Y., Symposium, C., Science and Technology of Microfabrication, MRS Fall Meeting, pp. 133, Boston, MA Dec. 1–6, 1986.Google Scholar
3. Rothman, L. B., J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 130, p. 1131, 1983.Google Scholar
4. Stillwagon, L. E. and Taylor, G. N., private communication.Google Scholar
5. Ren, F., Pearton, S. J., Hobson, W. S., Fullowan, T. R., Lothian, J. R., and Yanof, A. W., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 50, p. 860, 1990.Google Scholar
6. Ren, F., Fullowan, T. R., Abernathy, C. R., Pearton, S. J., Smith, P. R., Kopf, R. F., Lashowski, E. J., and Lothian, J. R., Electron. Lett. vol. 27 p. 1054, 1991.Google Scholar
7. Sacher, E. and Susko, J. R., Appl. Polymer Sci., 26, pp. 679 1981.Google Scholar