Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T09:32:12.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AlAs-GaAs Beterojunction Engineering by Means of Group IV Interface Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

G. Bratina ,
L. Sorba ,
G. Biasiol ,
L. Vanzetti  and
A. Franciosi
G. Bratina
Affiliation:
Laboratorio TASC dell' INFM, Area di Ricerca di Trieste, Trieste, Italy and Department of Chemical Engineering and Materiale Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
L. Sorba
Affiliation:
Laboratorio TASC dell' INFM, Area di Ricerca di Trieste, Trieste, Italy and Department of Chemical Engineering and Materiale Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
G. Biasiol
Affiliation:
Laboratorio TASC dell' INFM, Area di Ricerca di Trieste, Trieste, Italy and Department of Chemical Engineering and Materiale Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
L. Vanzetti
Affiliation:
Laboratorio TASC dell' INFM, Area di Ricerca di Trieste, Trieste, Italy and Department of Chemical Engineering and Materiale Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
A. Franciosi*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio TASC dell' INFM, Area di Ricerca di Trieste, Trieste, Italy and Department of Chemical Engineering and Materiale Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
*
c.Author to whom correspondence should be addressed, at the University of Minnesota.
Get access

Abstract

Valence and conduction band discontinuities in AlAs-GaAs heterostruc-tures have been tuned through fabrication of epitaxial Ge layers at the interface. The local interface dipole associated with the Ge layer can be added to, or subtracted from the natural band offsets depending on the growth sequence. Comparison with earlier results for AlAs-Si-GaAs heterostructures, shows that the observed dipole is consistent in direction and order of magnitude for Ge and Si interface layers. The dipole initially increases with interface layer thickness more rapidly for Ge than for Si, however the total maximum dipole achievable at the interface is identical (0.4eV), within experimental uncertainty, for the two group IV elements.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 240: Symposium E – Advanced III-V Compound Semiconductor Growth, Processing and Devices , 1991 , 603
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a.

Fellow of the Area di Ricerca di Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

b.

On leave from Istituto di Acustica O. M. Corbino del C. N. R., via Cassia 1216, 1–00189 Roma, Italy.

References

REFERENCES

1. See, for example, Capasso, F., Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. 16, 23 (1991), and references therein.Google Scholar
2. McKinley, J. T., Hwu, Y., Rioux, D., Terrasi, A., Zanini, F., Margaritondo, G., Debska, U., and Furdyna, J. K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, 1917 (1990), and references therein.Google Scholar
3. Maierhofer, Ch., Zahn, D. R. T., Evans, D. A., and Horn, K., in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on the Formation of Semiconductor Interfaces, Rome, Italy, May 6–10, 1991 Appl;.Surf. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
4. Shen, T.-H., Elliott, M., Williams, R. H., and Westwood, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 842 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Sorba, L., Bratina, G., Ceccone, G., Antonini, A., Walker, J.F., Micovic, M., and Franciosi, A., Phys. Rev. B 43, 2450 (1991);Google Scholar
Ceccone, G., Bratina, G., Sorba, L., Antonini, A., and Franciosi, A., Surf. Sci. 251–252, 82 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Baroni, S., Resta, R., Baldereschi, A., and Peressi, M., in Spectroscopy of Semiconductor Microstructures, Fasol, G., Fasolino, A., and Lugli, P., eds. (Plenum Publ. Corp., New York, 1989), p. 251.Google Scholar
7. Muñoz, A., Chetty, N., and Martin, R., Phys. Rev. 41, 2976 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Peressi, M., Baroni, S., Resta, R., and Baldereschi, A., Phys. Rev. B 43, 7347 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Bratina, G., Sorba, L., Antonini, A., Vanzetti, L., and Franciosi, A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 2225 (1991);Google Scholar
Sorba, L., Bratina, G., Antonini, A., Franciosi, A., Tapfer, L., Migliori, A., and Merli, P., Phys. Rev. B (to be published).Google Scholar
10. Strite, S., Ünlü, M.S., Adomi, K., and Morkoç, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1673 (1990) and references therein.Google Scholar
11. Bratina, G., Sorba, L., Antonini, A., Biasiol, G., and Franciosi, A., Phys. Rev. B (in press).Google Scholar
12. An alternate growth procedure was also examined in which no As flux was employed during Ge deposition (background pressure during deposition <5×10−10 Torr). XPS-determined interface layer thickness and band offsets were found to be consistent, within experimental uncertainly, for samples fabricated with the two deposition procedures, although the two procedures corresponded to qualitatively different RHEED patterns from the Ge layer.Google Scholar
13. Strite, S., Unlu, M.S., Adomi, K., Gao, G.-B., Agarwal, A., Rockett, A., Morkoç, H., Li, D., Nakamura, Y., and Otsuka, N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8, 1131 (1990) and references therein.Google Scholar
14. The RHEED pattern changes in the absence of an As flux, although none of the other results discussed here is affected [12]. For example, a 2×2 RHEED pattern is observed during Ge growth at 360°C on GaAs (OOl), in agreement with the results of Ref. 13.Google Scholar
15. See, for example, Kraut, E.A., in Heterojunction Band Discontinuities : Physics and Device Applications, edited by Capasso, F. and Margaritondo, G. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987), and references therein.Google Scholar
16. This in agreement with most recent photoemission determinations of the valence band offset, such as those by Hirakawa, K., Hashimoto, Y., and Ikoma, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57,. 2555 (1990), who found δEv=0.44±0.05eV,Google Scholar
Yu, E. T., Chow, D. H., and McGill, T. C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7, 391 (1989), who found δEV=0.46±0.07eV,Google Scholar
Waldrop, J. R., Grant, R. W., and Kraut, E. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5, 1209 (1987), who found δEV=0.36–0.46eV, andGoogle Scholar
Katnani, D. and Bauer, R. S., Phys. Rev. B 33, 1106 (1986), who reported δEV=0.39±0.07eV. Optical determinations of the valence band offsets byGoogle Scholar
Dawson, P., Moore, K. J., and Foxon, C. T., Proc. SPIE 792, 208 (1987), andGoogle Scholar
Wolford, D. J., in Proc. of the 18th International Conference of the Physics of Semiconductors, edited by Engstrom, O. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987), p. 1115, yielded values of 0.53–0.56eV so that in principle a small systematic discrepancy may exist between photoemission and optical determinations of the offset.Google Scholar
17. The latter obviously is the actual growth mode in the absence of the group IV interface layer, and is therefore likely to remain the actual growth mode also at the lowest Ge or Si coverages explored, but for higher Ge or Si thicknesses the situation may be different. See Bringans, F. D., Olmstead, M. A., Ponce, F. A., Biegelsen, D. K., Kruaoc, B. S., and Yingling, R. D., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 3472 (1988) and references therein.Google Scholar
18. McKinley, J. T., Hwu, Y., Koltenbah, B. E. C., Margaritondo, G., Baroni, S., and Resta, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B (in press), and Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on the Formation of Semiconductor Interfaces, Rome, Italy, May 6–10, 1991; Appl. Surf. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar