Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:25:18.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aeschynite and Euxenite Structure-Types as Host Phases for Rare-Earths and Actinides from HLW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

W. L. Gong
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131. USA, wgong@unm.edu
R. C. Ewing
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131. USA, wgong@unm.edu
L. M. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131. USA, wgong@unm.edu
H. S. Xie
Affiliation:
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550002, China
Get access

Abstract

Aeschynite and euxenite structure-types are proposed as host phases for rare earth elements and actinides. Aeschynite and euxenite structure types are represented by the general formula: (REE,Y,Th,U,Ca)(Ti,Nb,Ta)2O6. In both structure-types, a variety of large cations such as rareearths and actinides can be accommodated in the tunnels of connected holes in aeschynite or the interlayer space in euxenite. The waste loadings (rare-earths and actinides) in aeschynite and euxenite are at least 40 wt. % based on chemical compositions of naturally occurring aeschynite and euxenite.

The sol-gel method has been successfully used to prepare aeschynite and euxenite as preferred crystalline ceramics. The aged gels and finally calcined products have been characterized by infrared and Raman spectroscopy, differential thermal analysis, and X-ray diffraction analysis. The fabrication technology of aeschynite and euxenite type ceramics is feasible by using hot-pressing as a final processing stage. The mechanistic processes of aeschynite and euxenite formation by the sol-gel method as described as REE(OH)3 · Nb(OH)5·Ti(OH)4 coprecipitation; the polymerization of Nb and Ti hydroxides to form isolated (Nb,Ti)2O10 di-octahedra through oxygen and hydroxyl bridges accompanied by a dehydration reaction; welding together of isolated “pieces” of (Nb,Ti) 2010 to form longer (Nb,Ti)2O10 di-octahedral chains; REE being connected to the dioctahedral chains through oxygen and hydroxyl bridges; and to gradually form small threedimensional nucleates of aeschynite and euxenite. Critical data from the literature on radiation effects and secondary alteration are reviewed as a part of the evaluation of the long-term performance of these phases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Hatch, L.P., Am. Sci. 41, 410 (1953).Google Scholar
[2] Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C., Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Toyko, 1988).Google Scholar
[3] Gong, W.L., Ewing, R.C., Wang, L.M., and Xie, H.S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, 807 (1995).Google Scholar
[4] Ewing, R.C. and Chakoumakos, B.C., Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Handbook, Vol.8 (1982).Google Scholar
[5] Gong, W.L., Ph.D dissertation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1988.Google Scholar
[6] Ewing, R.C., Can. Miner. 14, 111 (1976).Google Scholar
[7] Giuseppeetti, G. and Tadini, C., N. Jb. Miner. Mh 20, 301 (1990).Google Scholar
[8] Cummings, J.P. and Simonsen, S.H., Am. Miner. 55, 91 (1970).Google Scholar
[9] Institute of Geochemistry of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Geochemistry of the Baiyun Obo Ore Deposits (Science Press, Beijing, China, 1988).Google Scholar
[10] Harker, A.B., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Toyko, 1988), pp. 361.Google Scholar
[11] Ewing, R.C., Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 39, 521 (1975).Google Scholar
[12] Gong, W.L. and Shi, G.S., Acta Miner. Sin. 12, 120 (1992).Google Scholar
[13] Ewing, R.C. and Ehlmann, A.J., Can. Miner. 14, 111 (1975).Google Scholar
[14] Seifert, H. and Beck, B., N. Nb. Mineral. Abh. 112, 117 (1965).Google Scholar
[15] Ihinger, P.D., Hervig, R.L., and MacMilian, P.F., Reviews in Mineralogy 30, 67 (1994)Google Scholar
[16] Husson, E., Repelin, Y., Dao, N.Q., and Brusset, H., J. Chem. Phys. 66, 5173 (1977).Google Scholar
[17] Repelin, Y., Husson, E., and Brusset, H., Spectrochim. Acta 35A, 937 (1979).Google Scholar
[18] Greegor, R.B., lytle, F.W., Ewing, R.C., and Harker, R.F., Nucl. Instru. Meth. Phys. Res. B1, 587 (1984).Google Scholar
[19] Gong, W.L., Ewing, R.C., Wang, L.M., and Xie, H.S. (submitted to the 30th IGC, Beijing, China, 1996).Google Scholar
[20] Ewing, R.C., Science 192, 1336 (1976).Google Scholar
[21] Ewing, R.C. and Haaker, R.F., Nucl Chem. Waste Mgmt. 1, 51 (1980).Google Scholar
[22] Van Wambeke, L., N. Jb. Miner. Abh. 112, 117 (1970).Google Scholar
[23] Weber, W.J., Ewing, R.C., and Wang, L.M., J. Mater. Res. 9, 688 (1994).Google Scholar
[24] Lumpkin, G.R., Ewing, R.C., Chakoumakos, B.C., Greegor, R.B., Lytle, F.W., Foltyn, E.M., Clinard, F.W. Jr., Boatner, L.A., and Abraham, M.M., J. Mater. Res. 1, 564 (1986).Google Scholar
[25] Lumpkin, G.R. and Ewing, R.C., Phys. Chem. Minerals 16, 2 (1988).Google Scholar
[26] Murakami, T., Chakoumakos, B.C., Ewing, R.C., Lumpkin, G.R., and Weber, W.J., Am. Miner. 76, 74 (1991).Google Scholar
[27] Weber, W.J., Wald, J.W., and Matzke, Hj., J. Nucl. Mater. 138, 196 (1986).Google Scholar