Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:43:33.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopic Studies of Cu-AI alloy/SiO2 Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Pei-I Wang
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Electronics, Electronics Manufacturing and Electronic Media, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
G. -R. Yang
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Electronics, Electronics Manufacturing and Electronic Media, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
S. P. Murarka
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Electronics, Electronics Manufacturing and Electronic Media, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
T. -M. Lu
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Electronics, Electronics Manufacturing and Electronic Media, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
Get access

Abstract

Cu-Al alloys have been recommended for application as the diffusion barriers/adhesion promoters for advanced copper based metallization schemes. In this study interfacial reaction between Cu-Al alloy/SiO2 is investigated by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). A set of thin Cu-Al alloy films, about 30Å in thickness, are deposited on SiO2 substrates. These were directly examined by XPS. This is followed by a study of the interface formation during bias temperature stressing (BTS) of metal/dielectric interfaces in Cu/Cu-5at.%AI/SiO2 subjected to the electrical testing. Core-level spectra of silicon and aluminum obtained indicate that the reduction of silicon dioxide initiates at room temperature when the aluminum concentration in the copper alloys reaches about 5 atomic percent. The silicon diffusion into metal or vice versa is found to be suppressed during the low temperature anneal (300°C) by the Al2O3 interfacial layer. Also, a difference is present in the observed chemical states and interfacial reaction progressing between sputter and electron-beam deposited films. The films of Cu doped with Al appear to act as a suitable diffusion barrier and adhesion promoter between SiO2 and Cu.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Murarka, S. P., Hymes, S. W., Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences 20, 87(1995).10.1080/10408439508243732Google Scholar
2 Lanford, W. A., Ding, P. J., Wang, W. Hymes, S., Murarka, S. P., Thin Solid Films 20 87 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Ding, J., Landford, W. A., Hymes, S., Murarka, S. P., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 3627 (1994).Google Scholar
4 Wu, P. K., Lu, T.-M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2710(1997).10.1063/1.120185Google Scholar
5 Miura, Y., Hirose, K., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 3554 (1995).10.1063/1.359536Google Scholar
6 van Gurp, G. J., J. Appl. Phys. 44, 2040 (1973)10.1063/1.1662511Google Scholar
7 Beraud, C., Courbiere, M.,. Snouf, , Juve, D., Treheux, D., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 4545 (1989).Google Scholar
8 Pei-Wang, I., Murarka, S. P., Bedell, S., Lanford, W. A., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 514, 281(1998).Google Scholar
9 Mattogno, G., Righini, G., Montesperelli, G. and Traversa, E., J. Mater. Res. 9, 1426 (1994).10.1557/JMR.1994.1426Google Scholar
10 Pei-I Wang, Yang, G.-R., Murarka, S. P., Lu, T.-M., submitted to Thin Solid Films.Google Scholar
11 Nandan, R., Murarka, S. P., Pant, A., Shepard, C., Lanford, W. A., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 260, 929 (1992).Google Scholar
12 Nicollian, E. H., Brews, J. R., MOS Physics and Technology, John Wiely & Sons, New York, 1982, pp. 424435.Google Scholar