Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:14:17.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using Elasticity to Correct for Boundary Effects in Calculations of Stress-Diffusion Coupling Parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Brian Puchala
Affiliation:
bpuchala@umich.edu, University of Michigan, Materials Science and Engineering, Materials Science & Engr Dept., 3062 HH Dow Bldg., 2300 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
Michael Falk
Affiliation:
mfalk@umich.edu, University of Michigan, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 3062 HH Dow Bldg., 2300 Hayward, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
Krishna Garikipati
Affiliation:
krishna@umich.edu, University of Michigan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2250 G.G. Brown, 2350 Hayward, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
Get access

Abstract

The effect of stress on diffusion during semiconductor processing becomes important as device dimensions shrink from microns to nanometers. Simulating these effects requires accurate parameterization of the formation and migration volume tensors of the defects that mediate diffusion on the atomistic scale. We investigate the effect of boundary conditions on the accuracy of atomistic calculations of defect formation energies and formation volume tensors. Linear elasticity provides a correction to the effect of the boundaries on the resulting relaxation volume tensor. By a formal proof we show that the correction term is zero for free boundaries and for periodic boundary conditions with zero mean boundary stress. This is demonstrated in the far field for periodic and free boundary conditions for an isotropic (vacancy) and an anisotropic (<110> intersitial) defect in Stillinger-Weber silicon. For periodic boundary conditions, formation volume tensor components converge to within 5% in a 216 atom simulation cell. For free boundary conditions, slow convergence of elastic constants results in slow convergence of formation volumes. Most significantly, this provides a new method to calculate the formation volume from constant volume calculations. This removes the need for relaxing boundaries, allowing for simpler and more efficient algorithms. We apply this method to both the vacancy and the <110> interstitial in Stillinger-Weber silicon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Packan, P. A., MRS Bull. June, 18 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Park, H., Jones, K. S., Slinkman, J. A., Law, M. E., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 3664, (1995).Google Scholar
3. Aziz, M. J., Zhao, Y., Grossman, H. J., Mitha, S., Smith, S. P., Schiferl, D., Phys. Rev. B 73, 054101, (2006).Google Scholar
4. Garikipati, K., Falk, M., Bouville, M., Puchala, B., Narayanan, H., J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 54, 1929, (2006).Google Scholar
5. Barnett, D. M., Phys. Stat. Sol. 59, 741, (1972).Google Scholar
6. Eshelby, J. D., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 241, 376 (1957).Google Scholar
7. Eshelby, J. D., “Elastic inclusions and inhomogeneities,” Progress in Solid Mechanics, ed. Hill, R. and Sneddon, J. (North Holland Publishing Co., 1961) p. 89.Google Scholar
8. Puchala, B., 2006. In preparation.Google Scholar
9. Stillinger, F. H., Weber, T. A., Phys. Rev B 31, 5262, (1985).10.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262Google Scholar
10. Balamane, H., Halicioglu, T., Tiller, W. A., Phys. Rev. B 46, 2250, (1992).Google Scholar
11. Maroudas, D., Brown, R. A., Phys. Rev. B 47, 15562, (1993).Google Scholar
12. Schober, H. R., Phys. Rev. B 39, 13013, (1989).Google Scholar
13. Nastar, M., Bulatov, V. V., Yip, S., Phys. Rev. B 53, 13521, (1991).Google Scholar