Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T06:45:10.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theoretical Relationships Between Reactivity and Permeability for Monomineralic Porous Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Robert W. Smith
Affiliation:
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, P.O. Box 1625 MS-2107, Idaho Falls, ID 83415
Annette L. Schafer
Affiliation:
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, P.O. Box 1625 MS-2107, Idaho Falls, ID 83415
Andrew F. B. Tompson
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808 L-206, Livermore, CA 94551
Get access

Abstract

The release of contaminants to the subsurface has lead to potential or actual contamination of groundwater resources. The remediation of these plumes requires improved capability for the prediction of contaminant fate and transport. Key to improving predictive capabilities is an increased understanding of natural chemical (or reactive) heterogeneity in subsurface media and how chemical and physical heterogeneity are related. Although the effects of physical heterogeneity on transport has received significant attention, similar investigations of chemical heterogeneity, and the correlation of chemical and physical heterogeneity are in their infancy.

Theoretical considerations for unconsolidated porous media composed of sand-sized grains of a single reactive phase suggest that chemical reactivity and permeability are inversely related. This correlation is consistent with measured permeability, porosity, and surface area data for unconsolidated sands. The correlation arises because both reactivity and permeability are functions of the surface area of the porous media. This relationship suggests that for a heterogeneous porous media, significant contaminant transport will occur in zones of minimal reactivity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Garabedian, S.P., Gelhar, L.W., and Celia, M.A., Tech. Report 315, R.M. Parsons Laboratory, Mass. Inst. Tech., Cambridge, MA, 1988.Google Scholar
2. Tompson, A.F.B., Water Resourc. Res. 29, 3709 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Robin, M.J.L., Sudicky, E.A., Gillham, R.W., and Kachanoski, R.G., Water Resourc. Res. 27, 2619 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Barber, L.B. II, Thurman, E., and Runnells, D.D., J. Contain. Hydrol. 9, 35 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Coston, J.A., Fuller, C.C., and Davis, J.A., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59, 3535 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Jackson, R.E. and Inch, K.J., Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 231 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Lerman, A., Geochemical Processes: Water and Sediment Environments (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1979) p. 481.Google Scholar
8. Thompson, A.H., Katz, A.J., and Krohn, C.E., Advances in Physics 36, 625 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Bear, J., Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. (American Elsevier, New York, 1972) p. 764.Google Scholar
10. Lake, L.W., Enhanced Oil Recovery (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989) p. 550 Google Scholar
11. Dzombak, D.A. and Morel, F.M., Surface Complexation Modeling, Hydrous Ferric Oxide (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1990) p. 393.Google Scholar
12. Panda, M.N. and Lake, L.W., Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 79, 431 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Beard, D.C. and Weyl, P.K., Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 57, 349 (1973).Google Scholar
14. Panda, M.N. and Lake, L.W., Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 78, 1028 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Tompson, A.F.B., Shafer, A.L., and Smith, R.W., Wat. Resourc. Res. 32, in press (1996).Google Scholar