Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T00:23:02.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Dependent Schottky Contacts to InP and GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Z. Q. Shi
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo, Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
R. L. Wallace
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo, Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
W. A. Anderson
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo, Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
Get access

Abstract

The barrier height of a Pd/n-InP diode was found to be increased from 0.48 to 0.96eV with the substrate temperature decreased from 300 to 77K during metal deposition. The leakage current density was reduced by more than six order of magnitude. It is obvious that the interface Fermi-level position lies well outside the variance associated with Fermi-level pinning. The barrier height for the Au/n-GaAs diode was found to be increased by about 0.25 eV with low temperature deposition and the leakage current reduced by more than five orders of magnitude. The mechanism responsible for the ultrahigh barrier height obtained at low substrate temperature was investigated by Raman spectroscopy, current voltage temperature measurement, deep level transient spectroscopy, and electroreflectance technique. The metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS)-like structure formed at low substrate temperature and the reduction of interface state density may be the main reason for the dramatic enhancement of Schottky barrier height.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Spicer, W. E., Lindau, I., Skeath, P., and Su, C. Y., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 17, 1019 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Brillson, L. J., Surf. Sci. Rep. 2, 123 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 465 (1988).Google Scholar
4. McLean, A. B. and Williams, R.H., J.Phys. C. 21, 783 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Spicer, W. E., Chye, P. W., Skeath, P. R., Su, C. Y., and Lindau, , J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 16, 1427 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Cao, R., Miyano, K., Kendelwicz, T., Chin, K. K., Lindau, I., and Spicer, W. E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B5, 938 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Stiles, K., Kahn, A., Kilday, D. G., and Margaritondo, G., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B5, 987 (1987): 5, 1527 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Chang, S., Shaw, J. L., Viturro, R. E., and Brillson, L. J., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A8, 3830 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Wilks, S. P., Morris, J. I., Woolf, D.A., and Williams, R.H., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B9, 2118 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Shi, Z. Q. and Anderson, W.A., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 3137 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Sze, S. M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Ed. (Wiley, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
12. Aspnes, D. E., “Handbook on Semiconductors”, edited by Balkanski, M. (North Holland, New York, 1980), Vol. 2.Google Scholar
13. Stiles, K. and Kahn, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 440 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Monch, W., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B6, 1270 (1988).Google Scholar
15. Yamasaki, K., Yoshida, M., and Sugano, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 18, 113 (1979).Google Scholar
16. Zhang, T. and Sigmon, T. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2785 (1991).Google Scholar