Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:10:51.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis of Actinide-Doped Ceramics: from Laboratory Experiments to Industrial Scale Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Alexander A. Kitsay ,
Vladimir M. Garbuzov  and
Boris E. Burakov
Alexander A. Kitsay
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Mineralogy and Radiogeochemistry, the V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, 28, 2-nd Murinskiy ave., St. Petersburg, 194021, Russia, fax: +7–812–346–1129
Vladimir M. Garbuzov
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Mineralogy and Radiogeochemistry, the V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, 28, 2-nd Murinskiy ave., St. Petersburg, 194021, Russia, fax: +7–812–346–1129
Boris E. Burakov
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Mineralogy and Radiogeochemistry, the V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, 28, 2-nd Murinskiy ave., St. Petersburg, 194021, Russia, fax: +7–812–346–1129
Get access

Abstract

The experience of the Laboratory of Applied Mineralogy and Radiogeochemistry of the V.G.Khlopin Radium Institute on synthesis of Pu-Am-doped ceramics is summarized. During the last 5 years, dozens of actinide doped polycrystalline samples and single crystals have been successfully synthesized such as zircon, hafnon, cubic zirconia, monazite, Ti-pyrochlore, perovskite and garnet. Actinide loading has been varied as follows:

-239Pu - from 5–6 wt.% in zircon (polycrystalline and single crystals), hafnon, garnet and perovskite to 10 wt.% in Ti-pyrochlore and up to 37 wt.% in zirconia;

- 238Pu - from 2.5 wt.% in zircon single crystals to 5 wt. % in polycrystalline zircon and 10 wt.% in monazite and cubic zirconia;

- 243Am - 20–23 wt.% in cubic zirconia and monazite.

The weight of each single ceramic pellet varied from 0.2 to 2.0 grams. Special furnaces developed in KRI for ceramic synthesis allowed obtaining up to 7 ceramic pellets simultaneously during the same experiment. The highest amounts of actinides used under glove-box conditions in the same experiment were: 1.5–2.0 g for 239Pu, 0.6 g for 238Pu and 0.3 g for 243Am. Most experiments on synthesis of ceramics and single crystals doped with 239Pu, 238Pu and 243Am carried out at the KRI did not lead to contamination of internal walls of glove boxes. No release of Pu-Am-aerosols was observed as a result of sintering or melting at 1300–1600°C. These results allowed us to conclude that at the present the KRI has developed the experimental basis for transferring laboratory innovations to the industry of actinide immobilization. It is important that adopting ceramic synthesis methods at industrial scale does not require development of new special equipment.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 807: Symposium Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVII , 2003 , 237
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Burakov, B.E., Anderson, E.B., Proc. 2nd Intern. Symp. NUCEF'98, JAERI-Conf.99–004 (Part I), 295–306 (1998).Google Scholar
2. 2.Burakov, B.E., Anderson, E.B. et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, Vol. 608, 419–422 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Burakov, B.E., Anderson, E.B., Excess Weapons Plutonium Immobilization in Russia ed. Jardine, J.L., Borisov, G.B., UCRL-ID-138361, Proc. Meeting for Coordination and Review of Work, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1–4/11/1999, 167–179 and 251–252 (2000).Google Scholar
Burakov, B.E., Anderson, E.B., et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, Vol. 663, 307–313 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Burakov, B. E., Anderson, E.B., CD-ROM Proc 8th Intern. Conf.ICEM'01, 30/09–04/10/2001, Bruges, Belgium, sess. 39 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Burakov, B.E., Anderson, E.B. et al., CD-ROM Proc. Intern. Conf. GLOBA'01, Paris, France, 9–13/09/2001, paper 006 (2001).Google Scholar
6. Anderson, E.B., Burakov, B.E., CD-ROM Proc Intern. Conf. GLOBA'01, Paris, France, 9–13/09/2001, paper 010 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Burakov, B.E., Anderson, E.B., Immobilization of Excess Weapons Plutonium in Russia: A Review ofLLNL Contract Work, ed. Jardine, L.J., Borisov, G.B., Proc. Meet, for Coordination and Review of Work, St. Petersburg, Russia, Nov. 13–16, 2000, UCRL-ID-143846, 229–234 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Burakov, B.E., Anderson, E.B., Review of Excess Weapons Disposition: LLNL Contract Work in Russia, ed. Jardine, L.J., Borisov, G.B., Proc. 3-rd Ann. Meet, for Coordination and Review of LLNL Work, St. Petersburg, Russia, Jan. 14–18, 2002, UCRL-ID-149341, 265–270 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Burakov, B.E., Anderson, E.B. et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, Vol. 713, 333–336 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Burakov, B.E., Hanchar, J.M. et al., Radiochimica Acta, 89, 1–3 (2002).Google Scholar
12. Burakov, B., Anderson, E. et al., J. Nucl. Science and Tech., Suppl. 3, 733–736 (2002).Google Scholar