Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T04:55:22.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure and Thermal Conductivity of Silica Aerogels from Computer Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Brian Good
Brian Good*
Affiliation:
brian.good@grc.nasa.gov, NASA Glenn Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Road, MS 106-5, Cleveland, OH, 44135, United States, 216-433-6296
Get access

Abstract

Aerogels are of current interest in the aerospace community due to their light weight and low thermal conductivity, making them suitable for a variety of applications, notably cryotank insulation.

These gels typically exhibit a complex structure; the smallest feature is a “primary” particle of amorphous silica, typically 2-5nm in diameter. The primary particles aggregate to form “secondary” particles, typically an order of magnitude larger, and these, in turn, form pearl-necklace structures whose details depend on the density. The gels appear to exhibit fractal dimensionality, at least over a small range of length scales.

In this work, we investigate the relationship between the structure of the gels, their dimensionality and density, and their thermal conductivity. We model the secondary-particle aggregate structure using a modified Diffusion Limited Cluster Aggregation (DLCA) model. The model produces qualitatively different structures at low and high densities that are consistent with experimental observation. At lower densities, we find evidence for a transition from fractal behavior at small length scales to approximately compact behavior at larger lengths.

We model the thermal conductivity using a variant of the random resistor network approach that has been used to describe, e.g. hopping electrical conduction in doped semiconductors. In our model, each secondary particle is assigned an effective thermal conductance that depends on the particle's size, and on the details of its contacts with neighboring particles; the conductivity of the gel network is obtained using standard numerical techniques. The scaling of the thermal conductivity with density and fractal dimension is discussed.

Keywords

aerogelthermal conductivitysimulation
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 885: Symposium A – The Hydrogen Cycle – Generation, Storage and Fuel Cells , 2005 , 0885-A09-35
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Husing, N. and Schubert, U., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 22 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Pierre, A. C. and Pajonk, G. M., Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4243 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Rousset, J. L., Boukenter, A., Champagnon, B., Dumas, J., Duval, E., Quinson, J. F. and Serughetti, J., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 8445 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Meador, M. A. B., Fabrizio, E. F., Ilhan, F., Dass, A., Zhang, G., Vassilaras, P., Johnston, J. C. and Leventis, N., Chem. Mater. 17, 1085 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Meakin, P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1119 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Kirkpatrick, S., Rev. Mod. Phys. 45, 574 (1973).Google Scholar
7. Mazurin, O. V., Streltsina, M. V. and Shvaiko-Shvaikovskaya, T. P., 1983 Handbook of Glass Data, Part A: Silica Glass and Binary Silicate Glasses, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
8. Woignier, : Woignier, T. and Phalippou, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 93 17 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Schaeffer, D. W., Martin, J. E. and Keefer, K. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2199 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Freltoft, T., Kjems, J. K. and Sinha, S. K., Phys. Rev. B 33, 269 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Vacher, R., Woignier, T., Pelous, J. and Courtens, E., Phys. Rev. B 37, 6500 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Hasmy, A., Anglaret, E., Foret, M., Pelous, J. and Julien, R., Phys. Rev. B 50, 1305 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Eden, M. in Proc. Of the Fourth Berkeley Symp. Of Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. IV, Neyman, F., ed., University of California, Berkeley, 1961.Google Scholar
14. Bensimon, D., Sharaiman, B. and Liang, S., Phys. Lett. 102A, 238 (1984).Google Scholar
15. Witten, T. A. and Sander, L. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1400 (1981).Google Scholar
16. Weitz, D. A. and Oliveria, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1433 (1984).Google Scholar