Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T20:40:39.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Speciation of Uranium and Thorium at the Broubster Natural Analogue Site, Caithness, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

D. Read
Affiliation:
WS Atkins Engineering Sciences, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 5BW, UK
P. J. Hooker
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Notts, NG12 5GG, UK
Get access

Abstract

Anomalously high concentrations of uranium, thorium and the rare earth elements (REE) are associated with peat-rich soils near Broubster, northern Scotland. The source of the anomaly has been traced to a hydrocarbon-containing mineralised zone within a uraniferous, calcareous Devonian sedimentary sequence. From there, the elements have been transported approximately 100 metres downslope and fixed within waterlogged peat deposits. The degree of concentration and fractionation accompanying actinide transport is extreme. This paper describes the results of a theoretical modelling exercise and complementary experimental study carried out to determine the chemical speciation of actinides at the Broubster site. Efforts made to identify mobilisation and retention mechanisms for uranium and thorium have led to the development of a simple model for actinide behaviour in the peat soils. The work, which forms part of an on-going programme of research into natural radionuclide migration, is primarily aimed at improving confidence in predictive models used for radiological assessment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Read, D., Krol, A.A. and Thompson, B.G.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, X edited by Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 84, Pittsburgh, PA 1987) pp 343354.Google Scholar
2. Thompson, B.G.J., DOE Report No. TR-DOE-8, 1986.Google Scholar
3. Come, B. and Chapman, N.A., CEC Report No. EUR11037EN, 1987.Google Scholar
4. Michie, U. McL., Gallagher, M.J. and Simpson, A, in Geochemical Exploration, edited by Jones, M.J. (London Inst. Min. Metall., 1972) PP 117130.Google Scholar
5. Hooker, P.J., MacKenzie, A.B., Scott, R.D., Ivanovich, M., Ball, T.K., Basham, I.R., Bloodworth, A.J. and Roberts, P.D., BGS Report No. FLPU 86–6, 1986.Google Scholar
6. Wolery, T.J., Lawrence Livermore Lab. Report No. UCRL-52658, 1985.Google Scholar
7. Read, D. and Liew, S.K., Proc. Int. Conf. “Groundwater Contamination : Use of Models in Decision-Making”, Amsterdam, 1987.Google Scholar
8. Ball, T.K., Milodowski, A.F. and Hooker, P.J. (to be published)Google Scholar
9. Read, D., Atkins ES Report No. 21170.01, 1988.Google Scholar
10. Gromet, L.P., Dymek, R.F., Haskin, L.A. and Korotev, R.L., Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 48, 2469 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Parkhurst, D.L., Thorstenson, D.C. and Plummer, L.N., USGS Report No. USGS/WRI 80–96, 1985.Google Scholar
12. Read, D. and Broyd, T.W., Radiochim. Acta (in press).Google Scholar
13. Schweingruber, M., NAGRA Report No. NTB-81–13, 1981.Google Scholar
14. Shanbhag, P.M. and Choppin, G.R., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 43, 3369 (1981).Google Scholar
15. Kim, J.I., in Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of the Actinides, edited by Freeman, A.J. and Keller, C. (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam, 1986) p 413.Google Scholar
16. Breward, N. and Peachey, D. (to be published).Google Scholar
17. Landstrom, O. and Sundblad, B., SKB Report No. SKB 86–24, 1986.Google Scholar
18. Szalay, A., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 28, 1605 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Walsh, M.P., Bryant, S.L., Schechter, R.S. and Lake, L.W., AlchE Journal 30, 317 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Adler, H.H., Proc. IAEA Symp. “Formation of Uranium Ore Deposits”, Athens, 1974.Google Scholar