Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T10:07:02.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Sodium Hydroxide in the System C3A-CaSO4-H2O at 30°C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Hanaa Youssef Ghorab
Affiliation:
Cement Chemistry Laboratory, University College for Girls, Ain Shams University, Heliopolis, Cairo, Egypt
Safaa Hussein Abou El Fetouh
Affiliation:
Cement Chemistry Laboratory, University College for Girls, Ain Shams University, Heliopolis, Cairo, Egypt
Get access

Abstract

The hydration reaction of C3A with gypsum (molar ratio = 1:1.5) has been studied in water and in sodium hydroxide solutions at 30°C. The hydration product were analyzed microscopically and by means of X-ray diffraction. The concentration of sulfate and aluminum in solution was determined spectrophotometrically. In the absence of alkali, the amount of ettringite formed passes through a maximum and is accompanied by almost complete consumption of sulphate ion in solution. Alkali depresses the formation of ettringite and accelerates that of calcium hydroxide. The monosulfate hydrate appears immediately in alkaline solutions and water then reappears after a day as a solid solution with the tetracalcium aluminate hydrate. The formation of the monophase solid solution is accompanied by the consumption of C3A, ettringite, and calcium hydroxide and by an increase in the amount of the dissolved aluminum. The presence of alkali markedly increases the initial sulfate ion concentration from solution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Chorab, H.Y. and Fetouh, S.H. Abou El, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., Chem. Technol. 35, 364 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Spiering, G.A.C.M. and Stein, H. N., Cem. Cone. Res. 6, 265, 487 (1976)Google Scholar
3. Gupta, P., Chatterji, S.U. and Jeffery, J.W., World Cem. Technol. 1(2), 159 (1970).Google Scholar
4. Regourd, M. and Mortureux, B., Summary of Contributions to a Seminar at the University of Technology, Eindhoven, 4, 13 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Bolkova, A.I., Domansky, A.I., Paramonova, V.A., Stavitskaja, V.A. and Nikuschchenko, V.M., Cem. Cone. Res. 7, 483 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Butt, J.M., Kolbasov, V.M. and Kozyreva, V.A., Proc. MCTI n.a. D.I. Mendeleev, 57, 48 (1975).Google Scholar
7. Abou, S.H. Fetouh, E., PhD thesis, Ain Shams University (1985).Google Scholar
8. Ghorab, H.Y. and Fetouh, S.H. Abou El, Zem.-Kalk-Gips 38(5), 267 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Ghorab, H.Y. and Fetouh, S.H. Abou El, Egypt. J. Chem. 28, (1984).Google Scholar