Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T20:15:55.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Process Improvements for Reductions in Total Charge and Interface Trap Densities of Thermally-Grown Sub-3.5nm-Thick Silicon Nitrides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Sanjit Singh Dang
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering University of Illinois at Chicago, 810 South Clinton Street, Chicago, IL 60607
Christos G. Takoudis*
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering University of Illinois at Chicago, 810 South Clinton Street, Chicago, IL 60607, E-mail: sdangl@uic.edu
*
**Corresponding Author, E-mail: takoudis@uic.edu
Get access

Abstract

Ultra-thin silicon nitride films are being studied for use as high-dielectric constant (highk) materials in future gate dielectric applications, as Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) transistors are scaled down to the sub-100nm regime. In this study, process modifications are proposed to reduce the total charge and interface trap densities in sub-3.5 nm-thick silicon nitride films, grown in NH3, in a conventional furnace at 900°C and 1 atm. It is shown that by employing a short (<1 min) oxynitridation step in NO, before nitridation, and oxynitridation/Ar-annealing steps, after nitridation, silicon nitride films can be thermally grown with a total charge density as low as about 2.5E10 q/cm2 and an interface trap density of about 2.1E11/(eV-cm2). Besides, the effect of using NO as opposed to N2O for oxynitridation steps is also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Buchanan, D.A., IBM J. Res. Develop. 43, p. 245 (1999).Google Scholar
2.Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 17, p. 1340 (1999)Google Scholar
3.Lucovsky, G., IBM J. Res. Develop. 43, p. 301 (1999).Google Scholar
4.Misra, V., Lazar, H., Wang, Z., Wu, Y., Niimi, H., Lucovsky, G., Wortman, J.J., and Hauser, J.R., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 17, p. 1836 (1999).Google Scholar
5.Ma, T.P., Appl. Surf. Sci. 117/118, p. 259 (1997).Google Scholar
6.Ma, T.P., IEEE Trans. Elect. Devices 45, p. 680 (1998).Google Scholar
7.Moslehi, M.M. and Saraswat, K.C., IEEE Trans. Elect. Devices 32, p. 106 (1985).Google Scholar
8.Shin, H., Choi, S., Hwang, T., Lee, K., J. Korean Phy. Soc. 33, p. S175 (1998).Google Scholar
9.Ajuria, S.A., Fitch, J.T., Workman, D., and Mele, T.C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, p. L113 (1993).Google Scholar
10.Kohn, C.M. and Goldfarb, W.C., Solid St. Tech., June (1995).Google Scholar