Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:55:49.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation And Characterization Of Ultra-Small Sized Metal And Semiconductor Particles In Sol-Gel Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Kyung Moon Choi
Affiliation:
University of California, Department of Chemistry, Irvine CA 92717-2025
Kenneth J. Shea
Affiliation:
University of California, Department of Chemistry, Irvine CA 92717-2025
Get access

Abstract

Poly(l,4-phenylene)-bridged and poly(1,6-hexylene)-bridged silsesquioxanes (PPS and HPS) were prepared by the sol-gel process. The surface areas and pore diameters of these porous xerogels were obtained by BET and BJH methods, respectively. These porous materials were used as a confinement matrix for the growth of small-sized semiconductor and transition metal clusters. Quantum-sized CdS particles in PPS (approximately 58+12 Â) and HPS (91+16 Â) matrices were prepared by first soaking the xerogel in a CdCl2 solution. Following a washing with water, a Na2S solution was then added. EDAX and electron diffraction techniques were used to identify the CdS particles. The particle sizes of CdS in PPS and HPS were determined by both UV measurements and from TEM images. Small-sized Cr clusters were prepared in dried xerogels by an internal doping method. Mixed Cr/CdS phases were also prepared by internal loading of a chromium metal precursor. Following deposition of CdS the xerogel was heated at 120 °C under high vacuum, resulting in formation of intimately mixed phases of Cr metal and CdS. Changes in morphology, in particular the surface area and pore size distribution were noted. A decrease in surface area and an increase in pore size were observed as a result of Cr metal deposition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 (a) Shea, K. J. Loy, D. A. Webster, O. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,114, 6700. (b) K. J. Shea, D. Loy and O. Webster, Chemistry of Materials 1989, 7, 572. (c) K. J. Shea, O. W. Webster, and D.A. Loy, “Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV”, MRS Symposium Proceedings, 1990,180, 975. (d) D. A. Loy, K. J. Shea, and E. M. Russie, “Better Ceramics through Chemistry V, MRS Symposium Proceedings,” 1992, 277, 699. (e) D. A. Loy, K. J. Shea, and J. H. Small. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1993, 760, 234.Google Scholar
2 Choi, K. M. Shea, K. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994,98 in press.Google Scholar
3 Oviatt, H. W. Shea, K. J. Small, J. H. Chem. Mater. 1993,5, 943.Google Scholar
4 Pocard, N. L. Alsmeyer, D. C. McCreery, R. L. Neenan, T. X. Callstrom, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,774, 769.Google Scholar
5 (a) Zhang, Y. Raman, N. Bailey, J. K. Brinker, J. C. Crooks, R. M.> J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 9098. (b) Schmid, G. Chem. Rev. 1992,92, 1709.+J.+Phys.+Chem.+1992,+96,+9098.+(b)+Schmid,+G.+Chem.+Rev.+1992,92,+1709.>Google Scholar
6 Weiler, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993,32, 41.Google Scholar
7 Hoffman, A. J. Yee, H. Mills, G. Hoffman, M. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 5540.Google Scholar
8 Warnock, J. Awschalom, D. D. Phys. Rev. B32 1985, 5529.Google Scholar
9 Borrelli, N. F. Hall, D. W. Holland, H. J. Smith, D. W. J. Apply. Phys. 1987,61, 5399.Google Scholar
10 Brunauer, S. Emmett, P. H. Teller, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938,60, 309.Google Scholar
11 Langmuir, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918,40, 1361.Google Scholar
12 Barrett, E. P. Joyner, L. G. Halenda, P. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 373.Google Scholar