Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T07:17:58.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pattern Formation and Unusual A + B → 0 Reaction Kinetics between Charged Reactants in Low Dimensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

E. A. Kotomin
Affiliation:
Institute of Solid State Physics, 8 Kengaraga Str., Riga LV-1063, Latvia Institute of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus-C, DK-8000, Denmark
V. N. Kuzovkov
Affiliation:
Institute of Solid State Physics, 8 Kengaraga Str., Riga LV-1063, Latvia Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
W. von Niessen
Affiliation:
Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The effect of non-equilibrium charge screening in the kinetics of the one-dimensional, diffusion-controlled A + B → 0 reaction between charged reactants in solids and liquids is studied. Incorrectness of static, Debye-Hückel theory is shown. Our microscopic formalism is based on the Kirkwood superposition approximation for three-particle densities and the self-consistent treatment of the electrostatic interactions defined by the nonuniform spatial distribution of similar and dissimilar reactants treated in terms of the relevant joint correlation functions. Special attention is paid to the pattern formation due to a reaction-induced non-Poissonian fluctuation spectrum of reactant densities. This reflects a formation of loose domains containing similar reactants only. The effect of asymmetry in reactant mobilities (DA - 0, DB > 0) contrasting the traditional symmetric case, i.e. equal diffusion coefficients, (DA = DB) is studied. In the asymmetric case concentration decay is predicted to be accelerated, n(t) ∞ t−α, α = 1/3 as compared to the well-established critical exponent for fluctuation-controlled kinetics in the symmetric case, α - 1/4 and/or the prediction of the standard chemical kinetics, α = 1/2. Results for the present microscopic theory are compared with the mesoscopic theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Kuzovkov, V.N. and Kotomin, E.A., Rep. Prog. Phys., 51, 1479 (1988).Google Scholar
[2] Kotomin, E.A. and Kuzovkov, V.N., Rep. Prog. Phys., 55, 2079 (1992).Google Scholar
[3] Kotomin, E.A. and Kuzovkov, V.N., Modern Aspects of the Diffusion- Controlled Reactions: Many-Particle Effects (vol. 34 in Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1996).Google Scholar
[4] Special issue of J. Stat. Phys., 65 (5/6) (1991).Google Scholar
[5] Eyring, H., Lin, S.H. and Lin, S.M., Basic Chemical Kinetics (Wiley, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
[6] Kuzovkov, V.N. and Kotomin, E.A., J. Stat. Phys., 72, 145 (1993).Google Scholar
[7] Kuzovkov, V.N. and Kotomin, E.A., J. Chem. Phys., 98, 9107 (1993).Google Scholar
[8] Balescu, R., Equilibrium and Non-equilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
[9] Kuzovkov, V.N., Kotomin, E.A. and von Niessen, W., J. Chem. Phys., 105 (1996).Google Scholar
[10] Kuzovkov, V.N., Kotomin, E.A. and von Niessen, W., Phys. Rev. E, 54 (1996).Google Scholar
[11] Kotomin, E.A., Kuzovkov, V.N., Frank, W. and Seeger, A., J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 27, 1453 (1994).Google Scholar