Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T06:00:21.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optical Response of Rough Metal Surfaces and Island Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

M. Urbakh*
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Get access

Abstract

This study treats the optical properties of different two-dimensional inhomogeneous systems in which localized and delocalized surface modes excited by incident light can exist. The optical response is described with the use of kinetic equations linking together different types of surface and bulk modes. It is important that both electromagnetic interactions between local modes and the dependence of the optical characteristics of centers on the local geometrical structure are taken into account.

It is shown that the behavior of experimentally observable quantities (enhancement ratioof the electric field at the surface, surface absorption, etc.) as functions of the frequency and concentration of local centers depends essentially on the excitation mechanismof local modes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wood, R.W., Philos, Mag. & J. Sci. 3, 396 (1902).Google Scholar
2. Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering, edited by Chang, R.K. and Furtak, T.E., (Plenum, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
3. maradudin, A.A., in Surface Polaritons, edited by Agranovich, V.M. and Mills, D.L. (North Holland, Amsterdam 1982) Ch. 10.Google Scholar
4. Brodsky, A.M. and Urbakh, M.I., Progress in Surf. Sci. 33, 91 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Mal'shukov, A.G., in The Chemical Physics of Solvation, edited by Dogonadze, R.R., Kalman, E., Kornyshev, A.A. and Ulstrup, J. (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1988) Part C., pp. 433478.Google Scholar
6. Brodsky, A.M. and Urbakh, M.I., J. Electroanal. Chem. 278, 179 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Daikhin, L.I. and Urbakh, M.I., Surf. Sci. 236, 187 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Persson, B.N.J. and Liebsch, A., Phys. Rev. 38, 4247 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Bergmann, D.J. and Imry, Y., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1222 (1977).Google Scholar
10. Efros, N. and Shklovskii, B.I., Phys. Stat. Solidi (b), 76, 475 (1976).Google Scholar
11. Urbakh, M.I., Electrochim. Acta 34, 1777 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Otto, A., Bornemann, T., Ertuk, U., Mrozek, I. and Pettenkofer, C., Surf. Sci. 210, 363 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Bornemann, T., Otto, A., Frank, K.H. and Reihl, B., Surf. Sci. 195, 161 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Foontikov, A.M., Sigalaev, S.K. and Kazarinov, V.E., J. Electroanal. Chem. 228, 197 (1987).Google Scholar