Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T18:25:45.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monitoring nanoprobe diffusion in osmotically-stressed hydrogels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Hacene Boukari
Affiliation:
boukarih@mail.nih.gov, National Institutes of Health, Lab. of Integrative & Medical Biophysics, Bldg 9/ Rm 1E122, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States, 301 594 0359
Candida de Silva
Affiliation:
silvaca@mail.nih.gov, National Institutes of Health, Lab. of Integrative & Medical Biophysics, Bldg 9/ Rm 1E122, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
Ralph Nossal
Affiliation:
nossalr@mail.nih.gov, National Institutes of Health, Lab. of Integrative & Medical Biophysics, Bldg 9/ Rm 1E122, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
Ferenc Horkay
Affiliation:
horkay@helix.nih.gov, National Institutes of Health, Lab. of Integrative & Medical Biophysics, Bldg 9/ Rm 1E122, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
Get access

Abstract

We have developed an optical chamber for studying the effect of swelling or shrinking of a gel on the translational diffusion of fluorescent nanoprobes embedded in the gel. On one side of the chamber, the gel is in contact with a hydrating or dehydrating polymeric solution through a porous membrane, allowing control of the rate of hydration or dehydration of the gel. On the other side, a laser beam is focused into the gel to excite the fluorescence of the nanoprobes, which is continuously monitored to reveal possible structural changes of the stressed gel. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy we measure correlation functions of the nanoprobes at various times following the contact of the gel with the hydrating or dehydrating solution, and determine changes of both the average concentration and the apparent diffusion time of the nanoprobes as the gel is shrinking or swelling. We have tested the chamber using the fluorophore, TAMRA (MW = 430 Da), embedded in a poly(vinyl-alcohol) gel that is being dehydrated by a solution of poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone) (28% w/w). As expected TAMRA moves slower as the gel shrinks. However, the changes in the diffusion time of TAMRA as a function of the PVA concentration of the shrinking gel appear to be different than those measured on TAMRA diffusing in PVA gels prepared at different PVA concentrations but with the same cross-link density.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Hoffman, A.S., Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 54, 3 (2002).Google Scholar
[2] Nuttelman, C. R, Henry, S. M, Anseth, K. S, Biomaterials 23, 3617 (2002).Google Scholar
[3] Schmedlen, R. H, Masters, K. S, West, J. L, Biomaterials 23, 4325 (2002).Google Scholar
[4] Michelman-Ribeiro, A., Boukari, H., Nossal, R., and Horkay, F., Macromolecules 37, 10212 (2004).Google Scholar
[5] Michelman-Ribeiro, A., Horkay, F., Nossal, R., and Boukari, H., Biomacrolecules 8, 1595 (2007).Google Scholar
[6] Vink, H., Europ. Polym. J. 7, 1411 (1971).Google Scholar
[7] Webb, W. W, Appl. Optics 40, 3969 (2001)Google Scholar
[8] Aragon, S. R and Pecora, R., J. Chem. Phys. 64, 1791 (1976).Google Scholar
[9] Chen, Y., Müller, J. D., Berland, K. M, Gratton, E., Methods 19, 234 (1999).Google Scholar
[10] Boukari, H., Nossal, R., and Sackett, D. L, Biochemistry 42, 1292 (2003).Google Scholar
[11] Horkay, F., Hecht, A-M, Mallam, S., Geissler, E., and Rennie, A. R, Macromolecules 24, 2896 (1991).Google Scholar