Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T07:17:42.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical Properties of CaF2 Single Crystal Substrates Determined from Nanoindentation Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Aruga
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Defense Academy, Yokosuka 239, Japan
R. B. Inturi
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487–0202
J. A. Barnard
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487–0202
R. C. Bradt
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487–0202
Get access

Abstract

CaF2 single crystals are interesting substrate materials for deposition of thin films. Its structure is cubic and it cleaves on {111} planes. CaF2, whose hardness has been reported to be 4 on the Moh's scale, is plastic and soft. In this study, the mechanical properties such as hardness(H) and Young's modulus(E) of single crystal CaF2 mineral were measured by using a nanoindenter with a Berkovich indenter normal to (100) and (111) planes. A normal indentation size effect (ISE) in accordance with the traditional power law and the proportional specimen resistance model (PSR) of Li and Bradt [1] was observed. The values of E and H on (100) plane are larger than those on (111) plane and these values on both planes decrease with increase in time during the hold segment. The effect of displacement rate on mechanical properties of (100) and (111) surfaces is also studied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Li, H. and Bradt, R. C., J. Non-Crist. Solids 146, 197 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Barraud, A., Ruaudel, A., and Vandevyver, M., Fr. Patent No. 2 564 231 (15 November 1985).Google Scholar
3. Mizukami, H., Tsutsui, K., and Furukawa, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 3349 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Evans, A. G., Roy, C., and Pratt, P. L., Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 6, 173 (1966).Google Scholar
5. O'Neill, J. B., Redtern, B.A. W., and Brookes, C. A., J. Mater. Sci. 8, 47 (1973).Google Scholar
6. Boyarskaya, Yu. S., Val'kovskaya, M. I., Grabko, D. Z., and Melent'ev, N. I., Fiz.-Khim Yavleniya Shlifovanii 1976, 155.Google Scholar
7. Gil, M. F. G., Alonso, P. F., and Francisca, P., Trab. Geol. 11, 73 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Boyarskaya, Yu. S., Grabko, D. Z., Dintu, M. P., Cryst. Res. Technol 16, 441 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Rao, K. K. and Sirdeshmukh, D. B., Bull. Mater. Sci. 5, 449 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Yang, W., Parr, R. G., and Uytterhoeven, L., Phys. Chem. Miner. 15 (2), 191–5 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Rao, K. K. and Sirdeshmukh, D. B., Pramana 34, 151 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Afanas'ev, I. I., Monokrist. Tekh. 3, 146 (1970).Google Scholar
13. Vidal, D., Hebd, C. R.. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. B279, 345 (1974).Google Scholar
14. Jones, L. E. A., Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 15, 77 (1977).Google Scholar
15. Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1,601 (1986).Google Scholar
16. Meyer, E., Phys. Z. 9, 66 (1908).Google Scholar
17. Sargent, P. M. and Page, T. F., Proc. Br. Ceram. Soc. 26, 209 (1978).Google Scholar
18. Atkins, A. G., Silverio, A., and Tabor, D., J. Inst. Metals 94, 369 (1966).Google Scholar