Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:52:31.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical Limitations of Materials for Steel Foil Based Flexible Electronics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Po-Chin Kuo
Affiliation:
pck205@lehigh.edu, LEHIGH UNIVERSITY, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 16A Memorial Drive RM303, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, United States, 6107583948, 6107584561
Vasilios G. Chouvardas
Affiliation:
vchou@csd.auth.gr, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Informatics, Thessaloniki, GR-54006, Greece
Jeff A. Spirko
Affiliation:
spirko@gmail.com, Lehigh University, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, United States
Konstantinos M. Hatalis
Affiliation:
kmhphysics@yahoo.com, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Informatics, Thessaloniki, GR-54006, Greece
Miltiadis K. Hatalis
Affiliation:
mkh1@lehigh.edu, Lehigh University, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, United States
Get access

Abstract

Thin steel foils have been successfully demonstrated as outstanding substrate materials for flexible electronics because of their high mechanical strength, flexibility, light weight and thermal stability. This work investigates mechanical limitations of thin film materials on steel foil substrates. We characterize a three layer structure consisting of 100μgm thick stainless steel foil as the substrate, followed by 1μgm thick spin-on-glass passivation layer and 0.3μgm thick patterned aluminum interconnect layer on top with varying widths between 10- 35μgm by means of a bending experiment. A collapsing radius test method was adopted for the bending experiment and an elliptical curve fit was used to facilitate the strain measurement. The failure strain of aluminum interconnect layer was detected by monitoring the continuity of the test circuit during the experiment. The corresponding results reveal that the passivation layer cracked at a tensile strain of 0.46% and delaminated at a compressive strain of 0.68%. The metal interconnect layer ruptured at a tension strain of 1.26% and delaminated from substrate at a compressive strain of 1.22% due to the delamination of the passivation layer underneath. We determined that the failure of the aluminum interconnect under tension was due to localized elongation caused by cracking of the passivation layer underneath and concluded that a wider interconnect could withstand a larger strain. The stainless steel foil plastically deformed at a relatively small strain of 0.13%; thus, the use of stainless steel with reversible bending capability for flexible electronics is mostly limited by the minimum elastic bending radius of the steel substrate. The flexibility of steel foil based devices can be effectively improved by decreasing the substrate thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Afentakis, T., Hatalis, M., Voutsas, A., and Hartzell, J., IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev., 53, 815 (2006)10.1109/TED.2006.871174Google Scholar
2. Wu, C.C., Theiss, S.D., Gu, G., Lu, M.H., Sturm, J.C., Wagner, S., and Forrest, S.R., IEEE Elect. Dev. Lett., 18, 609 (1997)10.1109/55.644086Google Scholar
3. Suo, Z., "Fracture in Thin Films." Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology, second edition, pp. 32903296, Elsevier Science (2001)10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/00587-8Google Scholar
4. Lewis, J., Grego, S., Chalamala, B., Vick, E., Chalamala, B. and Temple, D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 814, 18511859 (2004)10.1557/PROC-814-I8.5Google Scholar
5. Kater, T., Philips Research Report 2002/812 (2002)Google Scholar
6. Li, T., Huang, Z.Y., Suo, Z., Lacour, S.P., Wagner, S., Appl. Phys.Let. 85, 34353437 (2004)10.1063/1.1806275Google Scholar
7. Crawford, G., Flexible flat panel displays, (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005), p.112 Google Scholar
8. Kuwamura, H., ”Research on light-weight stainless steel structure in JAPAN” (2003)Google Scholar
9. Greek, S., Ericson, F., Johansson, S., Füresch, M. and Rump, A., J. Micromech. Microeng. 9, 245251 (1999)10.1088/0960-1317/9/3/305Google Scholar
10. Gianola, D. and Sharpe, W. Jr , Experimental techniques, 28, 2327 (2004)10.1111/j.1747-1567.2004.tb00182.xGoogle Scholar
11. Chen, Z., Cotterell, B. and Wang, W., Engineering Fracture Mechanics 69, 597603 (2002)10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00104-7Google Scholar