Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:32:15.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of the Effective Mass of Transparent Conducting films of Cadmium Tin Oxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

W. P. Mulligan  and
T. J. Coutts
W. P. Mulligan
Affiliation:
JX Crystals Inc., 1105 12th Ave NW, Suite A2, Issaquah, WA 98027
T. J. Coutts
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80403
Get access

Abstract

We have prepared transparent conducting films of cadmium stannate (Cd2SnO4 with resistivity as low as 1.5×10-4 Ω cm. The resistivity of these films is low because of their surprisingly high mobility (60 cm2 V-1 sec-1) at high carrier concentration (7×1020cm-3). We conducted an investigation to determine whether the high mobility is due to unusually low carrier effective mass or to a long carrier relaxation time. The conductivity effective mass and relaxation time were estimated by Drude free-electron modeling of reflectance and transmittance spectroscopie measurements. The Drude model appears to represent the behavior of cadmium tin oxide very well. The optical effective mass of the electrons in cadmium stannate is about 0.35 mo, which is similar to that of other transparent conducting oxides. By varying the doping level, we were able to fabricate films with various levels of degeneracy, but these showed no significant difference in effective mass.

We were also able to determine the carrier effective mass and the relaxation time by measuring four separate electron transport coefficients: conductivity, Hall, Seebeck, and transverse Nernst-Ettingshausen (Nernst). The Fermi level was found to vary from 0.31 to 0.83 eV above the conduction band minimum, and the conduction band was very close to parabolic in this range, with m* ∼ 0.33 mo, in good agreement with the optical result. We conclude that the effective mass of electrons in cadmium stannate is similar to electrons in other transparent conducting oxides and that high mobility results from a relatively long carrier relaxation time.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 471: Symposium G – Flat Panel Display Materials III , 1997 , 117
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Coutts, T. J., Wu, X., Mulligan, W. P., and Webb, J. M., J. Electron. Mater. 25, p. 935–943 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Nozik, A. J., Phys. Rev. B6, p 453–459 (1972).Google Scholar
3. Mealmaker, G. W. E., and Siegel, L. A., Thin Solid films 55, p. 67–81 (1978).Google Scholar
4. Wu, X., Mulligan, W. P., and Coutts, T. J., Thin Solid films, 286, p. 274–276, (1996)Google Scholar
5. Smith, R. A., Semiconductors. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.Google Scholar
6. Mulligan, W. P., Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 1997.Google Scholar
7. Trefny, J., and Mitra, N., Thin Solid films 167, p. 7–12 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Pisarkiewicz, T., Zakrewska, K., and Leja, E., Thin Solid films 153, p 479–486 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Wu, X., Coutts, T. J., and Mulligan, W. P., Presented at the 43rd National Symposium of the AVS, Philadelpha, PA, 1996. To be published in J. Vac Sci Technol. A.Google Scholar