Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T07:00:20.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of Diblock Copolymer thin film Morphology for Nanolithography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Miri Park
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
Christopher Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
Paul M. Chaikin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
Richard A. Register
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
Douglas Adamson
Affiliation:
Princeton Materials Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
Nan Yao
Affiliation:
Princeton Materials Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
Get access

Abstract

The microphase separated morphology of diblock copolymers can be used to generate well-ordered nanometer scale patterns over a large area. To achieve this goal, it is important to understand and control the behavior of diblock copolymer thin films on substrates, which can differ from the bulk behavior. We have investigated the morphologies and ordering in thin polystyrene-polybutadiene (PS-PB) diblock copolymer films on bare silicon and silicon nitride substrates, and also on polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) coated substrates. The PS-PB copolymers are synthesized to form, in bulk, PB cylinders or spheres in a PS matrix. In thin films (10–60 nm thick), prepared by spin-coating, we observe that the morphology and ordering of the microdomains are affected by strong wetting constraints and a reduced chain mobility on the substrate. The thinnest self-assembled layer of the copolymer films shows no in-plane microphase separation on both types of substrates. The PS blocks wet the PMMA substrates whereas the PB blocks wet the bare substrates as well as the air interface. Hence, different film thicknesses are necessary on the two types of substrates to obtain a uniform film of the first self-assembled cylindrical or spherical microdomain layer. The first layer of the cylindrical copolymer can vary from cylindrical to spherical morphology with a few nanometer decrease in film thickness. In the case of spherical PS-PB diblock copolymer films, we observe that the ordering of the microdomains is improved in the films on the PMMA substrates, compared to those on the bare substrates. We also demonstrate a successful transfer of the microdomain patterns to silicon nitride substrates by a reactive ion etching technique.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Bates, F. S., Science, 251, 898 (1991);Google Scholar
Bates, F. S. and Fredrickson, G. H., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 41, 525 (1990).Google Scholar
2 Mansky, P., Chaikin, P., and Thomas, E.L., J. Mater. Sci., 30, 1987 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Mansky, P., Harrison, P. M., Chaikin, P. M., Register, R. A., and Yao, N., Appl. phys. Lett., 68, 2586 (1996).Google Scholar
4 Hofstadter, D., Phys. Rev. B, 14, 2239 (1976);Google Scholar
Thouless, D. J., Kohmoto, M., Nightingale, M. P. and den Nijs, M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 405 (1982).Google Scholar
5 Weiss, D., Roukes, M. L., Menschig, A., Grambow, P., von Klitzing, K., and Weimann, G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 2790 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Kang, W., Stormer, H. L., Pfeiffer, L. N., Baldwin, K. W., and West, K. W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 23, 3850 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Volkmuth, W. D. and Austin, R. H., Nature 358, 600 (1992);Google Scholar
Volkmuth, W. D., Duke, T., Wu, M. C, Austin, R. H., and Szabo, A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 72, 2117 (1994).Google Scholar
8 Kryder, M. H., Thin Solid films, 216, 174 (1992).Google Scholar
9 Radzilowski, L. H., Carvalho, B. L., and Thomas, E. L., preprint, submitted to J. Poly. Sci. B (July 1996).Google Scholar
10 Liu, Y., Rafailovich, M. H., Sokolov, J., Schwarz, S. A., and Bahal, S., Macromolecules, 29, 899 (1996).Google Scholar
11 Henkee, C. S., Thomas, E. L., and Fetters, L. J., J. Mater. Sci., 23, 1685 (1988).Google Scholar
12 Hasegawa, H. and Hashimoto, T., Polymer, 33, 475 (1992).Google Scholar
13 Thomas, E. L., Kinning, D. J., Alward, D. B., and Henkee, C. S., Macromolecules, 20, 2934 (1987).Google Scholar
14 Morton, M., Fetters, L. J., Rubber Chem. Technol, 48, 359 (1975).Google Scholar
15 An ellipsometer is used to measure the average thickness in samples with uniform thicknesses, whereas an interferometer with 1 μm probe size is used to measure the local thickness variations in samples with a non-uniform topography (i.e. islands or holes).Google Scholar
16 Silicon nitride windows have been previously used in TEM micrography instead of copper grids for specimen support. For example, see Morkved, T. L., Lu, M., Urbas, A. M., Ehrichs, E. E., Jaeger, H. M, Mansky, P., and Russell, T. P., Science, 273, 931 (1996). Having a continuous silicon nitride background reduces the resolution and contrast of the image, however on a 10 nm length scale it is not significant.Google Scholar
17 Sze, S. M., VLSI Technology. 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988, pp. 184232.Google Scholar
18 Harrison, C. K., Park, M., Chaikin, P. M., Register, R. A., Adamson, D. H., and Yao, N., preprint, submitted to Polymer (July 1996).Google Scholar
19 Coulon, G., Ausserre, D., and Russell, T. P., J. Phys. France, 51, 777 (1990).Google Scholar
20 The microdomain orientation and ordering are sensitively dependent on film preparation. For example, see references 3 and 12.Google Scholar
21 Van Alsten, J. G., Sauer, B. B., and Walsh, D. J., Macromolecules, 25, 4046 (1992).Google Scholar
22 The RIE parameters used for the work presented in Figure 6 are 40 mTorr, 20 seem, 20W, ∼ 170 Vdc.Google Scholar