Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T03:24:44.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of C, N and O Ion-Implantation on Yellow Luminescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
L. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
N. Perkins
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
T. F. Kuech
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access

Abstract

Influence of C, N and O ion-implantation on the yellow luminescence (YL) of halide vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE) and metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) grown GaN has been studied by photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. For the HVPE-grown samples, only C implantation produces a significant enhancement of YL while its corresponding overall PL integrated intensity is only ˜72% of its original value. Implantation of O or N do not appreciably change the YL but decrease the BE integrated intensities by a factor of ten. The full-width-halfmaximum (FWHM) of the BE band expanded to about 1.4 × of the original value in all three cases. These results indicate that one source of the YL is strongly correlated to incorporation of C into the GaN film. The C-induced defect complexes in GaN are optically active while O or N does not lead to any new luminescence features. The variable-temperature PL measurements on the C-implanted HVPE-grown GaN reveal that the FWHM of the YL band increases linearly and the peak energy of the YL changes very little with the increasing measurement temperature, while the integrated intensity of the YL band decreases monotonically. This trend of the YL FWHM and peak energy with the measurement temperature can be explained by a two-channel transition model. For MOVPE-grown GaN films., all ion-implanted samples exhibit a significant loss of both the YL and overall integrated PL intensity. Residual C contamination in the MOVPE samples could be large compared to the additional ion-implanted carbon leading to a reduced impact of the ion-implanted carbon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Pankove, J. I. and Hutchby, J. A., J. Appl. Phys. 47, 5387(1976)Google Scholar
2 Wilson, R. G., Pearton, S. J., Abernathy, C. R. and Zavada, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2238(1995)Google Scholar
3 Zolper, J. C., Crawford, M. H., Pearton, S. J., Abernathy, C. R., Vartull, C. B., Yuan, C. and Stall, R. A, J. Electron. Mater. 25, 839(1996)Google Scholar
4 Binari, S. C., Dietrich, H. B., Kelner, G., Rowland, L. B., Doverspike, K. and Wiskenden, D. K., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 3008(1995)Google Scholar
5 Khan, M. A., Skogman, R. A., Schulze, R. G. and Gershenzon, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 42, 43(1983)Google Scholar
6 Zolper, J. C., Wilson, R. G., Pearton, S. J. and Stall, R. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1945(1996)Google Scholar
7 Rubin, M., Newman, N., Chan, J. S., Fu, T. C. and Ross, J. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 64(1994)Google Scholar
8 Metcalfe, R. D., Wickenden, D. and Clark, W. C., J. Lumin. 16, 405(1978)Google Scholar
9 for example, Hansen, D. M., Zhang, R., Perkins, N. R., Safvi, S., Zhang, L., Bray, K. L. and Kuech, T. F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1244(1998)Google Scholar
10 Mierry, P. De, Ambacher, O., Kratzer, H. and Stutzmann, M., Phys. Stat. Sol. 158, 587(1996)Google Scholar
11 Molnar, R. J. and Moustakas, T. D., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4587(1994)Google Scholar
12 Ogino, T. and Aoki, M., Japn. J. Appl. Phys. 19, 2395(1980)Google Scholar
13 Polyakov, A. Y., Shin, M., Freitas, J. A., Skowronski, M., Greve, D. W. and Wilson, R. G., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 6349(1996)Google Scholar
14 Ishibashi, A., Takeishi, H., Mannoh, M., Yabuuchi, Y. and Ban, Y., J. Electron. Mater. 25, 799(1996)Google Scholar
15 Niebuhr, R., Bachem, K., Bombrowski, K., Maier, M., Pletschen, W. and Kaufmann, U., J. Electron. Mater. 24, 1531(1995)Google Scholar
16 Suski, T., Perlin, P., Teisseyre, H., Leszczynski, M., Grzegory, I., Jun, J., Bockowski, M., Porowski, S. and Moustakas, T. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2188(1995)Google Scholar
17 Neugebauer, J. N. and Walle, C. G. Van de, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 503(1996)Google Scholar
18 Glaser, E. R., Kennedy, T. A., Crookham, H. C., Freitas, J. A. Jr, Khan, M. Asif, Olson, D. T. and Kuznia, J. N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2673(1993)Google Scholar
19 Liu, H., Kim, J. G., Ludwig, M. H. and Park, R. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 347(1997)Google Scholar
20 Liu, J., Perkins, N. R., Horton, M. N., Redwing, J. M., Tischler, M. A. and Kuech, T. F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3519(1996)Google Scholar
21 Ponce, F. A., Bour, D. P., Gotz, W. and Wright, P. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 57(1996)Google Scholar
22 Hoffmann, A., Eckey, L., Maxim, P., Holst, J., Heitz, R., Hofmann, D. M., Kovalev, D., Stevde, G., Volm, D., Meyer, B. K., Detchprohm, T., Hiramatsu, K., Amano, H. and Akasaki, I., Solid State Electron. 41, 275(1997)Google Scholar
23 Grandjean, N., Massies, J. and Leroux, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2071(1996)Google Scholar
24 Molnar, R. J., Nichols, K. B., Maki, P., Brown, E. R. and Melngailis, I., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 378, 479(1995)Google Scholar
25 Perkins, N. R., Horton, M. N., Bandic, Z. Z., McGill, T. C. and Kuech, T. F., Mat. Res. Sci. Symp. Proc. 395, 243(1996)Google Scholar
26 Zhang, R. and Kuech, T. F., in Proceedings of 1997 Fall meeting of MRS, Boston, Dec 1–5, 1997 Google Scholar
27 Zhang, R. and Kuech, T. F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1611(1998)Google Scholar
28 Zhang, R. and Kuech, T. F., J. Electron. Mater. (to be published)Google Scholar
29 Zhang, R., Zhang, L. and Kuech, T. F., unpublished Google Scholar
30 Boguslawski, P., Briggs, E. L. and Bernholc, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 233(1996)Google Scholar