Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T16:54:06.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved Uranium Recovery from the Process Streams in an Electroplating Facility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

John B. Pickett
John B. Pickett*
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, South Carolina 29808
Get access

Abstract

Cylindrical uranium slugs are used as irradiation targets in the production reactors at the Savannah River Plant. These slugs are first chemically etched, nickel plated, encased in aluminum, inspected, and individually pressure tested. An improved process was developed to recover the uranium from the acidic etching streams by controlling pH and the PO4 to U ratio so that the precipitation of the uranium as hydrogen uranyl phosphate was maximized. Bench scale tests demonstrated that the recovery of uranium could be increased to greater than 99.9% (vs. the current level of about 95% recovery). The recommended changes involved the addition of process effluent “hold” tanks. The addition of the various process streams to the neutralization/precipitation tank could therefore be controlled to maintain a consistent ratio of uranyl nitrate and phosphoric acid. Also, it was determined that a strong caustic solution (resulting from the dissolution of rejected aluminum slugs) could be utilized to neutralize the nitric and phosphoric acid solutions. The buffering action of the aluminum in the “caustic recovery solution” would reduce the sensitivity of the hydrogen uranyl phosphate precipitation to the phosphate ion concentration.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 44: Symposium N – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII , 1984 , 809
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Muto, T., Hirono, S., and Kurata, H. “Some Aspects of Fixation of Uranium from Natural Waters.” Min. Geol. (Tokyo), 15, pp. 287–298 (1965).Google Scholar
2. Langmuir, D. “Uranium Solution-Mineral Equilibria at Low Temperatures with Applications to Sedimentary Ore Deposits.” Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta., 42, pp. 547–569 (1978).Google Scholar
3. Marcus, Y. “Anion Exchange of Metal Complexes: The Uranyl Phosphate System.” Proc. of the 2nd U.N. International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, 3, p 465 (1958).Google Scholar
4. Emsley, J. and Hall, D. “The Chemistry of Phosphorus.” John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, p 18 (1976).Google Scholar
5. Kleinburg, J., Argersinger, W. J. Jr., and Griswold, E. “Inorganic Chemistry,” D. E. Heath and Co., Boston, MA, p 654 (1960).Google Scholar
6. Wilkinson, W. D. “Uranium Metallurgy, Vol. 1, Uranium Process Metallurgy,” John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, p 95 (1962).Google Scholar
7. Metzger, F. J. and Heidelberger, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 31, p. 1040 (1909).CrossRefGoogle Scholar