Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:34:32.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Generic Procedure for the Assessment of the Effect of Concrete Admixtures on the Sorption of Radionuclides on Cement: Concept and Selected Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

M. A. Glaus
Affiliation:
Waste Management Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
A. Laube
Affiliation:
Waste Management Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
L. R. Van Loon
Affiliation:
Waste Management Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
Get access

Abstract

A screening procedure is proposed for the assessment of the effect of concrete admixtures on the sorption of radionuclides on cement. The screening procedure focuses on a broad and generic assessment and can thus be used as a tool for the assessment of concrete admixtures possibly used in the future. The experimental feasibility of the screening procedure and the relevance of the results obtained are tested using a selection of superplasticisers and set modifiers. Selected results obtained for these admixtures are presented in this contribution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hadermann, J., In: Modeling in aquatic chemistry (Grenthe, I. & Puigdomenèch, I., eds.). OECD's Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, 153 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Roy, D.M., Daimon, M., Scheetz, B.E., Wolfe-Confer, D. and Asaga, K., In: Scientific basis for nuclear waste management (MacCarthy, G.J., ed.). Plenum Press, New York, 461 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Onofrei, M., Gray, M., Pusch, R., Börgesson, L., Karnland, O., Shenton, B. and Walker, B., Stripa Project, Technical Report, SKB TR 92–28, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (1992).Google Scholar
4. Xu, G.D. and Beaudoin, J.J., ACI Mat. J. 97, 418 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Spanka, G. and Thielen, G., Beton 5, 320 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Greenfield, B.F., Ilett, D.J., Ito, M., McCrohon, R., Heath, T.G., Tweed, C.J., Williams, S.J. and Yui, M., Radiochim. Acta 82, 27 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Uchikawa, H., J. Res. Chichibu Onoda Cement Corporation 46, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Glaus, M.A. and Van Loon, L.R., PSI Bericht, in preparation (2003).Google Scholar
9. Van Loon, L.R. and Glaus, M.A., PSI Bericht 98–07, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland. Also published as Nagra Technical Report, NTB 97–04, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland (1998).Google Scholar
10. Ernsberger, F.M. and France, W.G., Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 37, 598 (1945).Google Scholar
11. Blank, B., Rossington, D.R. and Weinland, L.A., J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 46, 395 (1963).Google Scholar
12. Rossington, D.R. and Runk, E.J., J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 5, 46 (1968).Google Scholar
13. Daimon, M. and Roy, D.M., Cem. Concr. Res. 8, 753 (1978).Google Scholar
14. Ramachandran, V.S., Cem. Concr. Res. 2, 179 (1972).Google Scholar
15. Van Loon, L.R., Glaus, M.A., Stallone, S. and Laube, A., Environ. Sci. & Technol. 3, 1243 (1997).Google Scholar