Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:37:29.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extracting Dispersion from Roughness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Claude Tricot*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Mathématiques Pures, Université Blaise Pascal63177 Aubiére, France
Get access

Abstract

A mathematical analysis of surfaces may help to understand how the carbon black is dispersed into polymer. Rubber samples are broken out, and the rupture interface is scanned with a prolometer. The roughness is detected at the micron scale. Roughness functions are dened, measuring the average oscillations of the surface. The roughness behaviour is “fractal” for small scales until around 10 microns, then become linear. A roughness ratio is defined, depending both on the scale and on the mixing time. There is evidence to suggest that the roughness ratio does not depend on the polymer, but only on the dispersion of the filler. A dispersion factor is derived, and results are shown on three diserent compounds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gerspacher, M., O'Farrell, C.P. and Yang, H.H., A Proposed Mechanism for the Reinforcement of Elastomers by Black, Carbon, Kautschuk Gummi Kunstoffe (1994).Google Scholar
2. Klüppel, M. and Heinrich, G., Fractal Structures in Carbon Black Reinforced Rubbers, Rubber Chem. Technol., 68, 623 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Walle, A. Van de, Tricot, C., Gerspacher, M., Modeling Carbon Black Reinforcement in Rubber Compounds, KGK Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe, 49, 172179 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Tricot, C., Curves and Fractal Dimension, (Springer-Verlag, 1995).Google Scholar
5. Tricot, C., Function Norms and Fractal Dimension, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 28, 189212 (1997).Google Scholar