Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-d5zgf Total loading time: 0.164 Render date: 2021-03-06T15:56:06.740Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Effects of the substrate on the determination of hardness of thin films by the nanoscratch and nanoindentation techniques: A comparative study for the cases of soft film on hard substrate and hard film on soft substrate.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Noureddine Tayebi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 Department of General Engineering, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Andreas A. Polycarpou
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Thomas F. Conry
Affiliation:
Department of General Engineering, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access

Abstract

Hardness values of Au/Fused Quartz and SiO2/Al systems, which correspond to the cases of soft film on hard substrate and hard film on soft substrate, were measured using both the nanoindentation and nanoscratch techniques. The effect of substrate interaction on the measurement of hardness using the nanoscratch technique is found to be much less pronounced compared to that of the nanoindentation technique. Such reduction in substrate effect is attributed to the features used in the nanoscratch analysis: (a) direct imaging of residual profile allows for the effect of pile-up/sink-in to be considered, (b) lower normal loads applied as compared to the nanoindentation, (c) effect of elastic recovery of the plastically deformed surfaces is included in the nanoscratch analysis, whereas the nanoindentation analysis is based solely on the load-displacement data. Moreover, experiments with residual scratch depths as shallow as 3 nm are used to estimate hardness of thin films; a promising indication for the use of such technique in the measurements of ultra-thin films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1. Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res., 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Saha, R. and Nix, W. D., Acta Materialia, 50, 23 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kral, E. R., Komvopoulos, K. and Bogy, D. B., ASME J. Trib., 118, 1 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Tayebi, N., Conry, T. F. and Polycarpou, A. A., J. Mater. Res., 18, 2150 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Yu, N., M.Sc. Thesis, University of Illinois, May 2002.Google Scholar
6. Chen, X., and Vlassak, J. J., J. Mater. Res., 16, 2974 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 8 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 6th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Effects of the substrate on the determination of hardness of thin films by the nanoscratch and nanoindentation techniques: A comparative study for the cases of soft film on hard substrate and hard film on soft substrate.
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Effects of the substrate on the determination of hardness of thin films by the nanoscratch and nanoindentation techniques: A comparative study for the cases of soft film on hard substrate and hard film on soft substrate.
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Effects of the substrate on the determination of hardness of thin films by the nanoscratch and nanoindentation techniques: A comparative study for the cases of soft film on hard substrate and hard film on soft substrate.
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *