Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T16:43:56.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Nanostructure on Bulk Mechanical Properties of Nacre - 3D Finite Element Modeling of the Segmented/Layered Biocomposite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Dinesh R. Katti ,
Kalpana S Katti ,
Jingpeng Tang ,
Jeffrey M. Sopp  and
Mehmet Sarikaya
Dinesh R. Katti
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA
Kalpana S Katti
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA
Jingpeng Tang
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA
Jeffrey M. Sopp
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Mehmet Sarikaya
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Get access

Abstract

Nacre is a segmented layered composite containing both nanoscale-thick organic and sub- micrometer thick scale inorganic phases. In addition to controlling the formation of the intricate architecture, the organic plays a significant role in the mechanical properties of the biocomposite. In our previous work, three dimensional finite element models of nacre were constructed to design “brick and mortar” micro-architecture to study effects of nonlinear response of the organic component. Recently, nanomechanical properties such as hardness and elastic moduli of the individual components of nacre have been determined using nanoindentation techniques. In this work, we used these actual properties of the components to perform mesoscale finite element models to quantitatively evaluate nanoscale effects. Specifically, we studied the effect of the solid contacts between the platelets through the organic layer on bulk properties under tensile and compressive loading. In the new 3D finite element model, we also incorporated the pseudo-hexagonal platelet morphology to more accurately represent the nacre microstructure. The multiscale approach in our study involves incorporation of experimentally obtained nanoscale parameters into meso-macroscale numerical models. Our simulations imply that mineral contacts in the aragonitic platelets have marginal impact both on bulk elastic behavior of nacre and yielding. Stress concentration in contact regions were high enough for the contacts to break long before yield started in nacre. These results have important implications in the design of biomimetic segmented-layered composites for improved mechanical properties.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 677: Symposium AA – Advances in Materials Theory and Modeling–Bridging Over Multiple-Length and Time Scales , 2001 , AA7.8
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Currey, J. D., in “The Mechanical Properties of Biological Materials”, eds. Vincent, J. F. V. & Currey, J. D. (Cambridge University Press, London, 1980)Google Scholar
2. Sarikaya, M., & Aksay, I. A., in “Structure, Cellular Synthesis, and Assembly of Biopolymers”, ed. Case, S. (In Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995) pp.1–25.Google Scholar
3. Jackson, A. P., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 5, 975 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Vincent, J. F. V., “Structural Biomaterial” (Macmillan Press, London, 1982) pp. 17-?; J. F. V. Vincent, “Structural Biomaterial” (Macmillan Press, London, 1982) pp. 171-?.Google Scholar
5. Belcher, A. M., Hansma, P. K., Stucky, G. D. & Morse, D. E., Acta Materialia 46, 733 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Sarikaya, M. & Aksay, I. A., in: “Design and Processing of Materials by Biomimetics” (American Institute of Physics, Washington D. C., 1995) pp. 34–90.Google Scholar
7. Introduction To The Finite Element Method, Desai, C. S. & Abel, J. F. (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1972)Google Scholar
8. Borgersen, S. E. & Sakaguchi, R. L., ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Conf. 28, 129 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Brodland, G. W. & Clausi, D. A., J. Biomech. Eng. 116, 146 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Mendis, K. K., Stalnaker, R. L., & Advani, S.H., J. Biomech. Eng. 117, 279 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Katti, D. R. & Katti, K. S., J. Mater. Sci., 36 (6) 1411 (2001).Google Scholar
12. Mercer, W. N., Sopp, J. M, Fong, H., Katti, K., Katti, D. R & Sarikaya, M., Proc. Microscopy & Microanalysis, MSA 58th Annual Meeting (2000) pp. 898–899.Google Scholar
13. Katti, K. S., Katti, D. R., Sopp, J. M., Mercer, W. M., & Sarikaya, M., “Nano-Meso-Macro scale response simulation of biomimetic nanocomposites,” 10th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), eds. Desai, C. S. et al. , Vol 1 (2001) pp 537–542.Google Scholar
14. Katti, D. R. & Katti, K. S., Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Vol 499 (MRS, Pittsburgh, 2000)Google Scholar
15. Katti, D. R., Katti, K. S, Sopp, J. & Sarikaya, M., In print J. Theo. Comp. Poly. Sci., (2001).Google Scholar
16. Sarikaya, M. et al. , unpublished results (2000).Google Scholar
17. Oliver, W. C. & Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 7 (6), 1564 (1992).Google Scholar