Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:38:13.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffusion of Implanted Dopants and Isolation Species in III-V Nitrides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

S.J. Pearton
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
C.R. Abernathy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
C.B. Vartuli
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
R.G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Hughes Research Laboratories, Malibu CA 90265
J.M. Zavada
Affiliation:
US Army Research Office, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Get access

Abstract

Twelve different elements used for doping or isolation were implanted into GaN, (and selected species into A1N and InN), and the resulting range parameters were measured by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. For lighter elements such as Be, F and H the agreement between experimental range and range straggle dtermined using a Pearson IV computer fitting routine and those predicted by TRIM 92 calculations was good, but for heavier elements such as Ge and Se the discrepancy can be as much as a factor of two in range. There was little redistribution of any of the investigated species up to 700 °C, except for 2H in A1N and S in GaN. Elements such as F and Be which are generally rapid difiusers in III-V compounds do not display any redistribution in GaN for temperatures up to 800 °C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Christensenand, N.E. Gorezya, I., Phys. Rev. B 50 4397 (1994).Google Scholar
2 Strite, S. and Morkoe, H., J. Vac. Sei. Technol. B 10 1237 (1992).Google Scholar
3 Pankove, J.I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 162 515 (1990).Google Scholar
4 Davis, R.F., Proc. IEEE 79 702 (1991).Google Scholar
5 Khan, M.A., Kuznia, J.N., Olson, D.T., Schaff, W.J., Burm, J.W. and Shur, M.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 1121 (1994).Google Scholar
6 Akasaki, I. and Amano, H., J. Electrochem. Soc. 141 2266 (1994).Google Scholar
7 Nakamura, S., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 30 L1705 (1991).; S. Nakamura, T. Mukai and M. Senoh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64 1687 (1994).Google Scholar
8 see, for example, Pankove, J.I. and Hutchby, J.A., J. Appl. Phys. 47 5387 (1976).Google Scholar
9 Matsuoka, T., Susaki, T. and Katsui, A., Optoelectronics-Devices and Technology 5 53 (1990).Google Scholar
10 Wilson, R.G., Stevie, F.A. and Magee, C.W., Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry(Wiley, NY 1989).Google Scholar
11 Abemathy, C.R., J. Vac. Sei. Technol. A 11 869 (1993).Google Scholar
12 Wilson, R.G., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 718 (1991).Google Scholar
13 Charles Evans and Associates, Redwood City, CA.Google Scholar
14 Biersack, J.P., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 35 205 (1988).Google Scholar
15 Short, K.T. and Pearton, S.J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 135 2835 (1988).Google Scholar
16 Zavada, J.M., Wilson, R.G., Abernathy, C.R. and Pearton, S.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64 2724 (1994).Google Scholar
17 Nakamura, S., Mukai, T., Senoh, M. and Iwasa, N., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 31 L139 (1992).Google Scholar
18 Van Vechten, J.A., Zook, J.D., Horning, R.D. and Goldenberg, B., Jap, J. Appl. Phys. 31 3662 (1992).Google Scholar
19 Pearton, S.J, Mat. Sei. Rep. 4 313 (1990).Google Scholar
20 Pearton, S.J., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7 4687 (1993).Google Scholar
21 Anholt, R., Balasingam, P., Chou, S.Y., Sigmon, T.W. and Deal, M., J. Appl. Phys. 64 3429 (1988).Google Scholar
22 Deal, M.D., Hu, C.J., Lee, C.C. and Robinson, KG, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 300 365 (1993).Google Scholar
23 Wilson, R.G., Abernathy, C.R., Pearton, S.J. and Zavada, J.M. (to be published).Google Scholar