Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T05:02:24.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Degradation of the Polyimide/Copper Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

K. K. Chakravorty
Affiliation:
Boeing Electronics High Technology Center, P.O. Box 24969, M/S 9Z-80, Seattle, Washington 98124–6269
V. A. Loebs
Affiliation:
Boeing Electronics High Technology Center, P.O. Box 24969, M/S 9Z-80, Seattle, Washington 98124–6269
S. A. Chambers
Affiliation:
Boeing Electronics High Technology Center, P.O. Box 24969, M/S 9Z-80, Seattle, Washington 98124–6269
Get access

Abstract

A comparative investigation of polyimide/Cu interface degradation has been carried out for ultrathin photosensitive, non-photosensitive, and preimidized polyimide precursor films cured while in contact with a Cu substrate. The role of curing byproducts and environmental conditions on interface degradation has been elucidated by means of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Immediately after curing, we observed some oxidation of the Cu in contact with non-photosensitive and photosensitive polyimide overlayers. On the other hand, only negligible oxidation was observed for the preimidized polyimide/Cu interface. Experiments in which samples were stored in vacuum, air and a humidity chamber show a dependence of the oxidation kinetics on air/moisture exposure. Preimidized and photosensitive polyimide/Cu interfaces, stored in air, became more extensively oxidized with time relative to identical samples stored in vacuum. Moreover, all three polyimide/Cu interfaces exhibited significantly more oxidation after 3 days in a humidity chamber than after 19 days of storage in air. Taken together, these data clearly demonstrate that absorbed water and its interaction with curing byproducts are key factors in the extent of Cu oxidation at the interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sato, K., Harada, S., Saiki, A., Kimura, T., Okubo, T., Mukai, K., IEEE Trans. on Parts, Hybrids & Packaging, PHP-9. No. 3, 175 (1973).Google Scholar
2. Miller, S., Circuits Manufacturing, April 1977, 39.Google Scholar
3. Jensen, R.J., Cummings, J.P., and Vora, H., IEE Trans. CHMT, CHMT-7, No. 4, 384, (1984).Google Scholar
4. Chakravorty, K.K., Cech, J.M., Chien, C.P., Metteer, K.P., Lathrop, L.S., Aker, B.W., Tanielian, M.H., and Young, P.L., ECS symposia Proc., Atlanta Georgia, May 1988, To be Published.Google Scholar
5. Chou, N. J. and Tang, C.H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2, 751 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Ho, P. S., Hahn, P.O., Bartha, J.W., LeGoues, G. W., and Silverman, B.D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 739 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Sanda, P.N., Bartha, J.W., Clabes, J.G., Jordan, J.L., Feger, C., Silverman, B.D., and Ho, P.S., J. Vac. Sci Technol. A 4, 1035 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Chambers, S.A. and Chakravorty, K.K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A6, 3008 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Pyralin LTP- PI-2590-D, Technical Data Sheet, E-81791, 1986, Du Pont Company.Google Scholar
10. Samuelson, G. and Lytle, S., Polyimide: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications, edited by Mittal, K.L. (Plenum Press Publisher, New York, 1984), p. 751.Google Scholar
11. Sacher, E., J. Macromol. Sci.-Phys., B 25, 405 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Rubner, R., Ahne, H., Kuhn, E., and Kolodziej, G., Photograph. Sci. Eng., 23 (5)., 303 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Chauvin, C., Sacher, E., Yelon, A., Groleau, R., and Gujrathi, S., Surface and Colloid Science in Computer Technology, Ed. Mittal, K.L., 1987, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar